Notices & Declarations Previous Item Next Item 10 July 2025 Torridge Council, Steve Hearse, Devon Magistrates Court Affidavit of Truth & Intent to lien Affidavit, Cease & Desist, Intent to Lien JT-Council Tax All Notices and Responses are signed as dated. WITHOUT PREJUDICE NOTICE OF REBUTTAL, AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH, CEASE AND DESIST, NOTICE OF INTENT TO LIEN, AND ENFORCEMENT RECORD RE: Fraudulent “Liability Orders” Dated 4 July 2025 Account Ref: 411116152 | Case Nos: 294249 & 294458 NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL; NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT From: Jason: (Family Tyldesley) A living man under common law Wooda Lakes, Pancrasweek, Holsworthy, Devon EX22 7JN To: Steve Hearse , Chief Executive Torridge District Council Riverbank House, Bideford, Devon EX39 2QG The Clerk of the Court North & East Devon Magistrates Court Civic Centre, North Walk, Barnstaple, Devon EX31 1DX Date: 10 July 2025 PART I – REBUTTAL AND CHALLENGE This notice is issued in continuity and reinforcement of the formal Council Tax Rebuttal and Sovereign Declaration Package dated 20 June 2025 copy enclosed), delivered without prejudice and under common law. All prior declarations, demands, and rebuttals stand as unrebutted and form part of the record of facts. I, Jason: (Family Tyldesley), a living man under common law, do not consent to representation by or joinder with the legal fiction “JASON TYLDESLEY.” I am not a person, subject, agent, resident, employee, or citizen of any statutory body, nor am I party to any lawful contract with Torridge District Council. On 4 March 2025 , I served a lawful System Removal Notice , revoking all presumed consent, demanding proof of jurisdiction, and formally objecting to all statutory claims and assumptions. No rebuttal or evidence has ever been provided. This remains unrebutted . On receipt of two “Summons for Non-Payment” in June 2025, I issued a Notice of Rebuttal and Conditional Acceptance . Again, no response or lawful counterclaim was received. You have now issued alleged “Liability Orders,” with threats of enforcement, deductions, and collection actions—all based on administrative assumption , not lawful judgment. These “orders”: Are not sealed or signed by any magistrate ; Appear on council letterhead , not the court’s; Provide no proof of contract , consent, or jurisdiction. They are therefore void ab initio , and their continued use constitutes fraud by misrepresentation . PART II – AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH I, Jason: (Family Tyldesley), solemnly affirm: I am a living man under natural and common law jurisdiction. I have never entered into a lawful contract with Torridge District Council. I do not recognise the authority of Barnstaple Magistrates Court unless jurisdiction is proven. I have never knowingly or voluntarily consented to be: Represented by any legal fiction; An agent, subject, officer, taxpayer, resident, or citizen of the Crown or statutory body. I have never provided explicit, informed, voluntary consent to any statutory scheme, obligation, or enforcement procedure. I hereby reaffirm and repeat the revocation of all presumed or assumed consents , whether historical, implied, or otherwise. I do not owe the claimed amounts, and no lawful proof of obligation exists. Any claim relying on my failure to appear or respond is fraudulent , as I have provided lawful notice and rebuttal. I hereby lawfully refuse to provide any private, financial, or personal information to any party acting without verifiable lawful authority. This affidavit is made on penalty of perjury under natural law and remains open for rebuttal for 14 days from date of receipt . After that time, all facts stated shall stand as truth in law and lawful judgement by default . Signed: __________________________________ Date: 10 July 2025 PART III – CEASE AND DESIST ORDER You are hereby ordered to: Cease all further communications demanding money or private financial information ; Withdraw and nullify all so-called liability orders ; Refrain from contacting third parties (e.g. enforcement agents) ; Acknowledge that no jurisdiction has been proven . Any further action will be treated as trespass, harassment, unlawful coercion , and malfeasance in public office . PART IV – PROVISIONAL ESTOPPEL Due to your failure to: Rebut lawful notices; Prove jurisdiction; Identify a named human being responsible for claims... … estoppel by silence and acquiescence is now provisionally invoked. You are estopped from further claims unless and until: Jurisdiction is proven; A lawful claim is submitted by a named and liable party. PART V – SCHEDULE OF BREACHES & INVOICE Breach Description Fee Unlawful summons issued without jurisdiction £1,000 Issuance of false liability orders £1,000 each Coercive demand for private information £1,000 Fraudulent misrepresentation of court process £2,500 Trespass upon rights/property (ongoing) £250/day Emotional distress and administrative burden £750 Failure to identify human liable party £500 Total Immediately Due: £7,000 + £250/day from 4 July 2025 onward Payment Terms: Full settlement is required within 14 days of receipt of this notice. If unpaid, this will constitute a lawful debt , enforceable by lien, lawful claim, or court action without further notice. PART VI – NOTICE OF INTENT TO LIEN Absent remedy and full settlement within the time stated: A Lawful Lien Notice will be issued; Naming Steve Hearse , the Chief Executive, as liable party; Secured against future pay, pension, or assets; With full publication of liability and wrongdoing. PART VII – NOTICE OF ENFORCEABILITY AND RECORD OF DUE PROCESS Let it be known that the undersigned, Jason: (Family Tyldesley), has: Notice/Instrument Served Date Response Deadline Status System Removal Notice 4 Mar 2025 18 Mar 2025 Unrebutted – Default Established Sovereign Declaration & Jurisdictional Rebuttal 20 Jun 2025 4 Jul 2025 Unrebutted – Default Established This Notice & Affidavit 10 Jul 2025 24 Jul 2025 Pending Together, these form a lawful and evidential record of unrebutted claims, standing, and invoices. Accordingly, all facts stated herein shall stand in law if not rebutted within 14 days. Failure to respond or remedy shall constitute a lawful judgment by default , giving rise to enforceable claims against those named and involved. If you are unfamiliar with the lawful implications of unrebutted affidavits, tacit consent, or common law enforcement, you are strongly advised to seek competent legal counsel immediately . Ignorance of lawful process is no defence , and any further action based on assumption or administrative procedure, rather than proven jurisdiction and due process, may give rise to personal liability, outside the protection of your corporate or public role. YOU HAVE BEEN LAWFULLY NOTIFIED. FAILURE TO RESPOND WITHIN 14 DAYS OF RECEIPT shall constitute full agreement to all facts, terms, invoices, and lawful demands as stated. Lawful remedies will then be pursued without further notice. All rights reserved. Without prejudice. Without recourse. Non-assumpsit. No contract. I do not consent. Signed, Jason: (Family Tyldesley) Living man under common law WITHOUT PREJUDICE NOTICE OF REBUTTAL, CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE, AND LAWFUL NON-ATTENDANCE RE: CASE NOs. 294249 & 294458 – Council Tax Summonses Dated 16 and 17 June 2025 Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal, and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent From: Jason: (Family Tyldesley) A living man under common law jurisdiction Wooda Lakes, Pancrasweek, Holsworthy, Devon EX22 7JN To: Steve Hearse , Chief Executive (Principal), Torridge District Council, Riverbank House, Bideford, Devon EX39 2QG & The Clerk , North & East Devon Magistrates Court, Civic Centre, Barnstaple, Devon EX31 1DX Date: 20th June 2025 SUMMARY OF POSITION This is a lawful notice of rebuttal, conditional acceptance , and formal notice of non-attendance to the summonses referenced above, issued in clear breach of lawful notice and without demonstrated proof of authority, jurisdiction, obligation, or lawful agency. You have failed to respond to the “System Removal Notice” served on 4 March 2025 (signed copy enclosed) , which revoked all consent and demanded lawful proof of claim. Your continued presumption constitutes knowing trespass, harassment, and misrepresentation. KEY DECLARATIONS I am a living man , not a corporate fiction, legal person, or subject of statutory governance. I am neither a resident, citizen, agent, employee, nor officer of any political corporation or statutory body. I am not contractually bound to any administrative scheme or regulation unless: Full disclosure was provided; A valid, mutually agreed contract was formed; Two wet-ink signatures exist as evidence of explicit, voluntary consent. I do not consent to represent the legal fiction “JASON TYLDESLEY” , nor do I act as its agent, surety, or trustee. No evidence has been presented proving that: Lawful jurisdiction exists over me as a living man; A verifiable obligation exists under common law; I have lawfully and knowingly surrendered inalienable rights. ON STATUTORY PRESUMPTION VS. LAWFUL AUTHORITY Statutory systems operate by consent and under presumption . They are administrative mechanisms of governance, not instruments of law. Without lawful contract or explicit, informed consent , all claims remain presumptive and non-binding. Administration becomes criminal when: Consent is explicitly denied yet ignored; Presumptions are enforced as obligations; No accountability is provided for those enforcing unverified claims. This is no longer administration —it is unlawful governance by deception and coercion. Any officer or employee acting upon such false claims incurs personal liability. NOTICE OF TRESPASS AND PERSONAL LIABILITY Effective immediately, any further: Summons, demand, or enforcement; Use of my private address for unsolicited statutory claims; Reliance upon presumed agency, citizenship, or residency… … constitutes trespass , fraud , and criminal misrepresentation , with full personal liability falling on the claimant. You are reminded: No immunity exists for ultra vires acts —an agency cannot shield individuals from accountability for unlawful acts done in its name. A trespass fee of £1,000 per instance will now apply, along with full lawful claims for damages. NOTICE OF LAWFUL NON-ATTENDANCE As there has been: No verified proof of lawful jurisdiction; No contract, no consent, no joinder; No named individual accepting liability; And continued attempts at forced joinder despite notice… …I will not attend your administrative summons. Attendance would imply consent to your unlawful presumption. This notice stands as formal rebuttal of jurisdiction , denial of all claims , and refusal of contract . You are now on notice. FORMAL NOTICE TO THE CLERK AND MAGISTRATES COURT Let it be known for the avoidance of doubt: I do not recognise the authority of the Magistrates’ Court in this matter unless lawful jurisdiction is first proven. The Magistrates’ Court is an administrative forum , acting under presumption of consent and authority. Now that jurisdiction has been lawfully challenged, this court must: Prove jurisdiction with verifiable evidence; Dismiss the claim in absence thereof; or Refer the matter to a court capable of hearing a jurisdictional challenge, such as the High Court. If this administrative forum proceeds without resolving the jurisdictional challenge , it acts ultra vires , without lawful standing, and any resulting orders or penalties are null and void ab initio . LAWFUL DEMANDS You are now required to: Immediately withdraw all summonses and claims . Provide proof of lawful authority, contract, and jurisdiction . Acknowledge personal liability by identifying the human being(s) making these claims. Chief Executive Steve Hearse , as the named principal and recipient of prior notice, is now personally liable for all further trespass, damages, and misrepresentations. All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit I do not consent. I do not accept your offer to contract. I waive the benefits. Yours faithfully, Jason: (Family Tyldesley) Living man, under common law (All inalienable rights reserved) WITHOUT PREJUDICE NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL; NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT Jason : (Family Tyldesley)Wooda Lakes, PancrasweekHolsworthy, DevonEX22 7JN To: Steve Hearse (Chief Executive)Torridge District CouncilRiverbank HouseBidefordDevonEX39 2QG Date: 4th March 2025 Subject: Final Notice – Revocation of Assumed Consent, Demand for Removal from Mailing Lists, and Immediate Cessation of All Statutory Claims, Licensing, Enforcement, and Regulatory Demands Against All Associated Legal Entities 1. Declaration of Living Status, Revocation of Assumed or Presumed Consent, and Legal Entities Covered I, Jason : of the family Tyldesley, am a living, breathing man under common law jurisdiction and not a legal fiction, corporate entity, or statutory person. This notice applies to all legal entities associated with me as a living being , including: The legal person : “JASON TYLDESLEY” (a statutory creation presumed without full disclosure or explicit agreement). All associated companies : Zen Jungle Limited (Company No. 12553647) Zen Jungle Retreat Limited (Company No. 12763398) Zen Jungle Estates Limited (Company No. 12758334) Revocation of Assumed Consent & Prohibition of Unlawful Claims of Any Kind I have never consented to representation by a legal fiction and therefore hold no obligation to any contracts, liabilities, or statutory claims presumed under that fiction. I hereby revoke any and all assumed or presumed consent to any statutory obligation, past, present, or future, related to any of the above entities. No claim of any kind that relies on the assumption of statutory authority is lawful unless full, verifiable proof is provided that such claims lawfully apply to a living being. This includes, but is not limited to: Council tax demands and property-related claims. Business rates, licensing requirements, and statutory registrations. Fines, penalties, or enforcement actions under statutory regulations. Any statutory obligation claimed against myself or any associated company. I declare that any claim reliant on assumption or presumption of consent to statute is unlawful following this revocation , as consent cannot lawfully be presumed once explicitly denied. If Torridge District Council believes it has lawful authority over me or any of the above-listed entities, it must now provide strict proof of claim (see Section 4). 2. Formal Demand for Immediate Removal from Torridge District Council Systems I do not consent to any continued use of my name, legal person, associated companies, or property address in any mailing lists, automated systems, or databases used to generate statutory claims, licensing demands, enforcement actions, or unsolicited correspondence . Under common law rights to privacy, property, and non-interference , I now require: Immediate and permanent removal of Jason : (Family Tyldesley), JASON TYLDESLEY, and all associated companies from all Torridge District Council databases and automated processing systems. A complete and permanent cessation of all statutory demands, penalty notices, enforcement actions, and further correspondence. Written confirmation within 14 days that all records have been updated and no further automated claims will be generated. Failure to comply will constitute unlawful interference, harassment, and trespass upon my property. 3. Explicit Non-Consent to Statutory Data Processing (GDPR Referenced with Non-Jurisdiction Clause) While this demand is made under common law , I also make the following explicit non-consent declaration under your own statutory data processing rules : I do not recognize GDPR as overriding my inalienable rights under common law. However, since Torridge District Council operates within statutory frameworks, it must adhere to its own rules. Under Article 17 (Right to Erasure) and Article 21 (Right to Object) of the UK GDPR , I now explicitly object to any further processing of my personal data for unsolicited statutory claims. Failure to comply confirms that Torridge District Council is acting unlawfully under both common law and its own statutory requirements. 4. Strict Proof of Claim – Final Opportunity to Prove Lawful Authority If Torridge District Council believes it has lawful authority over me, I require: Proof of jurisdiction – Evidence that the Council has lawful (not assumed) authority over me as a living being , not just my legal fiction or associated companies. Proof of lawful claim – Full evidence that any statutory claims, licensing requirements, or enforcement actions are valid, binding, and lawfully applicable beyond mere statutory assumption. Proof that my inalienable rights were knowingly waived – A wet-ink, mutually signed contract showing my fully informed, explicit, and voluntary consent to be bound by statutory obligations. Failure to provide all of the above will confirm that no lawful claim exists and that all prior demands were issued fraudulently, without due process, and under false presumption of authority. 5. Notice of Trespass – Unlawful Use of Private Property for Fraudulent Claims Effective immediately , I serve formal notice that any further: Statutory demands, licensing requirements, enforcement notices, fines, or penalties sent to my private address , or Attempts to enforce obligations upon me without lawful proof of claim … will constitute trespass, harassment, and fraudulent misrepresentation. Consequences of Further Trespass A fee of £1,000 per unsolicited statutory demand, penalty notice, or unlawful claim sent to my address. Formal legal action for harassment, misrepresentation, and interference if further correspondence is received. A claim for damages against Torridge District Council and any individuals responsible for non-compliance. 6. Royal Mail Notification – Return to Sender for Unlawful Correspondence In addition to this notice, I will be formally notifying Royal Mail that all correspondence from Torridge District Council is to be returned to sender . Any mail from Torridge District Council attempting to reach my property will be deemed an unwanted statutory claim , for which Torridge District Council will remain fully liable. Any claims that I “did not respond” after this notice will be fraudulent, as Torridge District Council will have knowingly ignored my lawful demand for non-interference. 7. Final Warning and Consequences of Non-Compliance This is your final opportunity to lawfully resolve this matter. I now require: Written confirmation within 14 days that my legal person and all associated companies have been removed from all Torridge District Council systems. A formal statement confirming that no further statutory claims will be generated, sent, or enforced against me. Strict proof of claim if you believe you have lawful authority to override this notice. Failure to comply within 14 days will result in: A formal complaint filed with the ICO against Torridge District Council for unlawful data processing. A lawful claim for damages for trespass, misrepresentation, and harassment. Further lawful notices of liability against any individuals responsible. This is not a request —this is a lawful demand based on inalienable rights, natural justice, and fundamental privacy principles. I expect full and immediate compliance. Yours sincerely, Jason : (Family Tyldesley) Living Being under Common Law Jurisdiction(All Inalienable Rights Explicitly Claimed and Reserved, Without Prejudice) DECLARATION OF NON-CONSENT AND LIVING AWARENESS Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent. Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal. I, the living man/woman known as Jason: (Family Tydelsey) , standing in my natural capacity under natural and common law, do hereby give notice as follows: ✦ 1. Living Being I am a living, conscious being of flesh, blood, and breath. I am not a legal fiction, corporate entity, trust, title, estate, or any registered instrument. I do not consent to the presumption of such identity, nor to being treated as subject to commercial or administrative codes. ✦ 2. Inalienable Rights My rights are inborn, inviolable, and inalienable. These include, but are not limited to: the right to life, freedom, privacy, freedom of movement, self-determination, freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, conscience, bodily autonomy, security of property, trade, barter, and the right to contract—or not to contract—freely. These rights are not subject to grant, regulation, removal, or surrender. Any act or claim that attempts to override, restrict, or administratively bind these rights without lawful contract is void, unlawful, and without effect . ✦ 3. No Joinder or Assumed Agency I do not consent to any joinder with a legal person, trust, estate, or registered name created or maintained without my explicit knowledge and agreement. No other being, organisation, or institution may lawfully act as agent, trustee, surety, or executor on my behalf without a valid, lawful contract between living beings, executed with full disclosure, mutual agreement, and two wet ink signatures. No act of registration, including at birth or thereafter, creates lawful agency or obligation upon me. ✦ 4. No Contract, No Obligation I stand under natural and common law only, and am bound by no external authority, jurisdiction, or obligation unless founded upon a valid contract made knowingly, voluntarily, with full disclosure, explicit consent, and two wet ink signatures. Where no such contract exists, no obligation is lawfully owed. ✦ 5. Inferior Jurisdictions Require Consent Jurisdictions such as statute, equity, maritime or admiralty are consensual constructs. I do not consent to their application to me without lawful contract and proven joinder. No claim of jurisdiction may arise from registration, presumption, silence, or assumed benefit. ✦ 6. Revocation of Implied Consent I revoke all presumed, inherited, or implied consents—whether arising from silence, registration, or non-rebuttal. Consent must be expressed and informed; presumption is not proof. ✦ 7. No Obligation to Respond or Perform Receipt of communication is not evidence of agreement. No duty exists to respond, appear, or perform in the absence of lawful contract. Silence is not acquiescence. ✦ 8. Living Awareness Sovereignty is not granted; it is the nature of being. I stand as source-aware and self-originating, and do not submit to any construct, claim, or jurisdiction lacking moral or lawful basis. ✴️ Lawful and Enduring Principles This notice stands upon enduring lawful and moral principles, including: Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescit – That which is void from the beginning cannot become valid by the passage of time. Consensus facit legem – Consent makes the law. Inalienable rights cannot be transferred or removed. He who asserts must prove. The burden of proof lies upon the claimant. All rights reserved. No rights waived.Given for the record and in honour. Autograph of the Living Being: ________________________ Date: ________________________ UNIVERSAL STANDING DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGN STATUS AND REBUTTAL OF PRESUMED JURISDICTION Private and Without Prejudice Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent; Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal Special Delivery – For the Private Record I. LAWFUL STANDING DECLARATION I, a living man known as Jason:(Family Tyldesley) , born of nature and not a legal fiction, hereby affirm and declare my sovereign status. I am not subject to the authority of any man-made entity, corporation, Crown, or government unless by voluntary , informed , and explicit consent established via lawful joinder. No such consent has ever been knowingly or lawfully given. I am not the legal fiction, corporate entity, trust, or estate created or referenced by the registration of birth or issuance of any state-generated certificate or identity document. “That which is created is subject to its creator. I was not created by the state, and therefore I am not subject to it.” II. REBUTTAL OF PRESUMPTIONS, TRUSTS, JOINDER & AGENCY I rebut: Any presumption of statutory or equitable jurisdiction; Any constructive, resulting, or implied trust allegedly created in my name; Any presumption that I am the beneficiary , trustee , executor , employee , or agent of any such trust or entity without my express and lawful agreement; Any assumption of legal representation or agency on behalf of the legal fiction or Crown; Any attempt to substitute statutory obligations for lawful duty . I do not act, nor have I ever knowingly and voluntarily acted, as an agent , employee , servant , or representative of the Crown, the United Kingdom Government, or any corporate or governmental entity deriving authority from the Crown. There exists no contract or agreement: Bearing two wet ink signatures, Formed with full disclosure and lawful meeting of minds, Wherein I knowingly accepted a role of agency, representation, or employment. Any such presumption of service, employment, fiduciary role, or Crown agency is hereby lawfully rebutted in full . Nemo potest praesumitur alienam personam agere – No one is presumed to act as another’s agent without proof. All legal, commercial, or administrative constructs that rely upon: Assumed consent, Silence as agreement, Birth registration as contract, Single signature adhesion agreements, are hereby lawfully and finally rebutted in full. A valid contract requires full disclosure, two wet ink signatures, and a lawful meeting of minds. Without all three, no contract exists in law. III. DENIAL OF REPRESENTATION OF LEGAL PERSON I do not now, nor have I ever, consented to represent or act as agent for the legal fiction or corporate entity identified in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS as JASON BRIAN TYLDESLEY , whether in part or in whole, in any legal, commercial, or statutory context. Any presumption of such representation, joinder, or agency is hereby lawfully rebutted in full . There exists no valid or enforceable contract: Formed by mutual agreement, Made with full disclosure, Entered into voluntarily, and Signed with two wet ink signatures, that binds Jason:(Family Tyldesley) , a living man, to the obligations, debts, duties, or liabilities of the legal person JASON BRIAN TYLDESLEY . He who denies must rebut; he who alleges must prove. If such a contract or instrument exists, I require its presentation in full, signed by both parties, or all presumption of representation is null and void. IV. CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE ON PROOF OF CLAIM Any man, woman, or entity making a claim, demand, or order against me, or seeking performance, payment, or compliance, must first provide: Verified Proof of Claim – A sworn, signed statement under full commercial and personal liability; Proof of Jurisdiction – Demonstrating lawful authority over the living man Jason:(Family Tyldesley), not the legal fiction; Evidence of Lawful Contract – A valid agreement, bearing my wet ink signature, formed with full disclosure and mutual consent, not presumed or unilaterally imposed; Statement of Cause – Lawful basis for any alleged debt, obligation, or duty; Identification of Claimant – Full legal and personal identity of the living man or woman making the claim, including their capacity and liability; Proof of Injury or Harm – Evidence of a verifiable injured party and measurable damage or loss caused by the living man Jason:(Family Tyldesley), with direct causation and standing to claim. Failure to provide these items within 14 days constitutes tacit agreement that no lawful authority or claim exists and that any further action will be deemed harassment, trespass, and unlawful coercion. V. REBUTTAL OF STATUTORY PRESUMPTION & COERCION I rebut and do not consent to: The presumption of guilt over innocence; The inversion of burden of proof ; The use of threats, penalties, or fear to induce compliance; The treatment of men and women as subjects of legislation without explicit and lawful agreement. Consent cannot be presumed or coerced. That which is not freely given is void. Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescit. VI. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS I expressly reserve all inalienable rights under: Natural Law Common Law The Laws of God (where applicable) The original jurisdiction of the living I waive no rights by silence, mistake, omission, nor through the actions of third parties. Any action taken against me absent verifiable lawful authority will be treated as trespass with full lawful recourse. VII. NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST You are hereby placed on notice to cease and desist all presumptive claims, enforcement attempts, or administrative correspondence unless and until you meet the conditions listed above. Continued assertion without lawful proof will be considered wilful trespass and may result in: Lawful claims of harassment, Private penalties under trespass, Personal commercial liability. VIII. STANDING DECLARATION This document constitutes my final, standing, and universal rebuttal . No further engagement will be made unless new lawful evidence is presented. Reference this notice in all future matters. DECLARANT Jason:(Family Tyldesley) a living man All rights reserved, none waived Without prejudice Signature: ___________________________ Date: _______________________________ Previous Item Next Item

MORE REVIEWS

We couldn't find what you're looking for Seems like there’s no services to book yet, please contact us for more information. Sessions by Day Browse by Session

Add terms and conditions 5 Session Breathwork Pack £95 £ 95 Get 10% off 5 sessions with this package. Use them anytime Valid for 12 months Select Choose your pricing plan Find one that works for you

Zen Jungle retreat is a 40 acre paradise full of unique and magical spaces, all purpose built for life-changing transformation. There 5 lakes, ancient woodland and so many places to explore, sit and connect. Retreat Spaces & Facilities Main retreat gallery Lounge, teaching & cinema yurt This really is the cosiest place to be and is used for most talks and workshops. It also doubles up as a cinema for cinema nights. Bistro & Kitchen Eating together as a community is a centre point at the retreat, so the bistro and kitchen are where we connect and cook Ceremonial Yurt This is a big 9m yurt, which is set for laid down facilitations such as Nidra, Breathwork and sound ceremony. Zenscape lakeside stage Zenscape is our lakeside music and meditation stage and it's right next to the wild swimming access. Lakes and woodlands The retreat is 40 acres of peace, nature and wildlife with lots to explore. Jungle Club Lakeside Grill This a beautiful intimate space for drinks, cookouts and simply hanging out. There's also games, cards and puzzles. The farm and sustainability The retreat has it's own food, water and power sources for independence and sustainability BUTTERFLY PROGRAM RETREAT MEDITATION RETREATS HOME Hive and edge, firepit gardens Firepit zones are located all over the retreat and this one is surrounded by beautiful gardens full of produce.

​This item is connected to a text field in your content manager. Double click the dataset icon to add your own content. I am a title 03 This item is connected to a text field in your content manager. Double click the dataset icon to add your own content. Previous Item Next Item This item is connected to a text field in your content manager. Double click the dataset icon to add your own content. Want to view and manage all your collections? Click the Data icon on the add panel to your left. In the Content Manager, you can update your items, add new fields, create dynamic pages and more. Your collection is already set up with fields and content. Add your own by editing each field, or import CSV files to your content manager. You can create fields for rich text, images, videos and more. Remember to click Sync, so visitors can see your collections on your live site. You can add as many collections as you need. Use input elements like custom forms and fields to collect info from your site visitors and store it in your content manager Collections. Make sure all your elements Connect to Data, and Preview your Live Site to check that everything is correctly binded.

Notices & Declarations Previous Item Next Item 31 July 2025 Public Notice, Torridge Council, Companies House Declaration of non-consent and living awareness. Declaration, Notice DECLARATION OF NON-CONSENT AND LIVING AWARENESS Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent. Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal. I, the living man/woman known as Jason: (Family Tydelsey) , standing in my natural capacity under natural and common law, do hereby give notice as follows: ✦ 1. Living Being I am a living, conscious being of flesh, blood, and breath. I am not a legal fiction, corporate entity, trust, title, estate, or any registered instrument. I do not consent to the presumption of such identity, nor to being treated as subject to commercial or administrative codes. ✦ 2. Inalienable Rights My rights are inborn, inviolable, and inalienable. These include, but are not limited to: the right to life, freedom, privacy, freedom of movement, self-determination, freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, conscience, bodily autonomy, security of property, trade, barter, and the right to contract—or not to contract—freely. These rights are not subject to grant, regulation, removal, or surrender. Any act or claim that attempts to override, restrict, or administratively bind these rights without lawful contract is void, unlawful, and without effect . ✦ 3. No Joinder or Assumed Agency I do not consent to any joinder with a legal person, trust, estate, or registered name created or maintained without my explicit knowledge and agreement. No other being, organisation, or institution may lawfully act as agent, trustee, surety, or executor on my behalf without a valid, lawful contract between living beings, executed with full disclosure, mutual agreement, and two wet ink signatures. No act of registration, including at birth or thereafter, creates lawful agency or obligation upon me. ✦ 4. No Contract, No Obligation I stand under natural and common law only, and am bound by no external authority, jurisdiction, or obligation unless founded upon a valid contract made knowingly, voluntarily, with full disclosure, explicit consent, and two wet ink signatures. Where no such contract exists, no obligation is lawfully owed. ✦ 5. Inferior Jurisdictions Require Consent Jurisdictions such as statute, equity, maritime or admiralty are consensual constructs. I do not consent to their application to me without lawful contract and proven joinder. No claim of jurisdiction may arise from registration, presumption, silence, or assumed benefit. ✦ 6. Revocation of Implied Consent I revoke all presumed, inherited, or implied consents—whether arising from silence, registration, or non-rebuttal. Consent must be expressed and informed; presumption is not proof. ✦ 7. No Obligation to Respond or Perform Receipt of communication is not evidence of agreement. No duty exists to respond, appear, or perform in the absence of lawful contract. Silence is not acquiescence. ✦ 8. Living Awareness Sovereignty is not granted; it is the nature of being. I stand as source-aware and self-originating, and do not submit to any construct, claim, or jurisdiction lacking moral or lawful basis. ✴️ Lawful and Enduring Principles This notice stands upon enduring lawful and moral principles, including: Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescit – That which is void from the beginning cannot become valid by the passage of time. Consensus facit legem – Consent makes the law. Inalienable rights cannot be transferred or removed. He who asserts must prove. The burden of proof lies upon the claimant. All rights reserved. No rights waived.Given for the record and in honour. Autograph of the Living Being: ________________________ Date: ________________________ Previous Item Next Item

Notices & Declarations Previous Item Next Item 22 August 2025 Cardiff Magistrates Court, Companies House Certificate of default - ZJR - Companies House Notice, Certificate of Default ZJR-Companies House CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT & NOTICE OF ENFORCEMENT Date: 22 August 2025 Affidavit Reference: 2500056578 From: Jason : (Family Tyldesley) Wooda Lakes Pancrasweek Holsworthy Devon EX22 7JN To: Louise Smyth CBE Chief Executive & Registrar Companies House Crown Way Cardiff CF14 3UZ (Ref: CR71/00032/25) Jamie Phillips Compliance Team Leader Companies House Crown Way Cardiff CF14 3UZ (Ref: CR71/00032/25) Pete Cowan Prosecuting Solicitor Companies House Crown Way Cardiff CF14 3UZ (Ref: LEGAL/PSC/ZJR/451/CR2) Lee Jenkins Prosecuting Solicitor Companies House Crown Way Cardiff CF14 3UZ (Ref: CR71/00032/25) Huw Morgan Legal Adviser to the Justices Cardiff Magistrates’ Court Fitzalan Place Cardiff CF24 0RZ (Court Ref: 2500056578) Declaration I, Jason : (Family Tyldesley), a living man, do hereby certify into the record of my Court of Record the following unrebutted facts: That on 25th July 2025 , I served upon each of the above-named individuals, in their private capacity , a sworn Affidavit of Truth and Court of Record . (Copy Enclosed) That this affidavit required rebuttal by sworn affidavit, under full personal and commercial liability, within fourteen (14) days of service. That no rebuttal has been received from any party. No sworn affidavit, no point-by-point rebuttal, and no lawful proof of jurisdiction or contract has been provided. That the only response received was a letter dated 31st July 2025 (from Prosecutor Pete Cowan), which: Confirmed receipt of my notices; Asserted they had “no legal effect”; Provided no sworn affidavit, no rebuttal of any claim, and no evidence of lawful authority. That such dismissals are irrelevant in law. The maxim stands: “An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in law.” Accordingly, the affidavit dated 25th July 2025 now stands as a final judicial determination in my Court of Record, binding in law and commerce, enforceable against all named parties. Court of Record Standing A Court of Record is lawfully established when: A living man testifies on oath; A permanent record is kept; The right to truth, remedy, and enforcement is upheld. The record shows: Trespass, misfeasance, and coercion under colour of law; Failure to rebut lawful notices; Knowledge and dishonour by silence or dismissal;Commercial liens unrebutted and matured. Lien and Liability Each named party is subject to a personal and commercial lien of £1,250,000 , for harm, trespass, and fraud by misrepresentation. These liens are: Publicly published via my website repository : ( https://www.zenjungle.org/notices-and-declarations/affidavit-of-truth-%26-court-of-record ); Enforceable in equity, commerce, and at law; Binding upon indemnity insurers. Enforcement Action By this notice, I confirm that enforcement will now proceed as follows: Filing of a Part 7 Claim in the High Court of Justice to convert the affidavit and liens into a court-sealed judgment debt. Serving of a Liability Notification to each party’s indemnity insurer, together with the affidavit, lien schedule, and this certificate. Enforcement by High Court Enforcement Officers , charging orders, or third-party debt orders. Continuation of publication and transparency in all actions taken. Final Declaration The Affidavit of Truth dated 25th July 2025 is now final, unrebutted, and binding . All liens are matured. Enforcement is in progress. Signed by my living hand and seal, this 21nd day of August 2025. Jason : (Family Tyldesley) Living Man under Common Law, All Inalienable Rights Reserved Court of Record Established Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent Previous Item Next Item

Notices & Declarations Previous Item Next Item 21 April 2025 Cardiff Magistrates Court, Companies House Response to Correspondence, Rebuttal of presumption and Motion to Dismiss or Refer Cease & Desist, Motion to Dismiss, Rebuttal of Presumption ZJR-Companies House RESPONSE TO CORRESPONDENCE, REBUTTAL OF PRESUMPTION, AND MOTION TO DISMISS OR REFER WITHOUT PREJUDICE NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL; NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT Special Delivery – Record of Service Maintained Date: 21st April 2025 From: Jason : (Family Tyldesley) Wooda Lakes, Pancrasweek Holsworthy, Devon EX22 7JN To: Clerk to the Justices Cardiff & Vale of Glamorgan Magistrates’ Court Fitzalan Place Cardiff CF24 0RZ CC: Pete Cowan / Lee Jenkins Prosecuting Solicitor, Companies House Crown Way Cardiff CF14 3UZ Ref: CR71/00032/25 ✦ 1. Acknowledgement of Correspondence and Procedural Rebuttal I acknowledge receipt of correspondence from the claimant dated 11 April 2025 and respond in full honour and without prejudice, for the lawful record. However, it must be stated that the claimant has: Failed to provide lawful proof of claim or jurisdiction in response to multiple prior conditional acceptances; Proceeded to obtain a court summons without having satisfied the lawful burden of proof ; And is now attempting to retroactively justify the claim via correspondence with the court , only after jurisdiction has been challenged. This conduct represents a distortion of lawful process and an abuse of the court’s time. The burden of proof must be met before any application to the court is made , and certainly before a summons is issued . The proper forum for resolving such matters is lawful pre-court correspondence , not retroactive justification through court proceedings. The use of the court in this manner—to build a case post-facto rather than present one lawfully at the outset—may constitute misrepresentation, procedural fraud, and administrative abuse . To allow this matter to proceed without lawful standing would render the court itself complicit in a process that violates both due process and natural justice . This document is submitted to prevent further waste of the court’s time , and to reaffirm that this is not the appropriate forum in which a claimant should attempt to prove a claim that has already been challenged as unlawful and unsupported. The claim remains entirely unproven , as documented throughout this response and Schedule A. No lawful jurisdiction, no valid claim, and no contractual consent have been evidenced by the claimant. Until such proof is provided in full and by lawful means, no obligation can lawfully arise , and any continued action in its absence may give rise to claims of fraud, trespass, and unlawful coercion. ✦ 2. Restatement of Lawful Position I, Jason : (Family Tyldesley), a living man, do not consent to represent the legal fictions “JASON BRIAN TYLDESLEY” or “ZEN JUNGLE RETREAT LIMITED” nor act as surety or agent for any such entity. I stand solely under common law jurisdiction. No contract exists between myself and any statutory authority that would indicate informed, voluntary consent to be governed by statute, or to represent a corporate person or entity. I have made repeated and unrebutted conditional acceptances requesting: Proof of jurisdiction, Proof of lawful claim, Proof of consent to statute, Proof of representation of the person or corporate entity, And evidence of a valid cause of action. To date, no such proofs have been provided. ✦ 3.JURISDICTION MUST BE PROVEN BEFORE PROCESS It is a foundational principle of law that jurisdiction is the first question that must be settled before any court may proceed. Without jurisdiction, all actions, rulings, and procedures are void ab initio (from the beginning). The onus is upon the party asserting jurisdiction — in this case, the claimant — to provide clear, lawful evidence that jurisdiction exists. As affirmed in Hagon v. Lord Advocate (1960) SC (HL) 31 and Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147 , a court that acts without jurisdiction is acting unlawfully , and any judgment it makes is null and without legal effect . Furthermore, under common law, it is established that: “The burden lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies.” ( “Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat” ). Thus, until and unless the claimant proves jurisdiction lawfully exists — by evidencing voluntary, informed, and explicit consent to statute — the court has no lawful standing to proceed , and must immediately hold all process in abeyance or dismiss the claim. I therefore challenge the jurisdiction of this court to hear any claim against me as a living man based on statutory obligations, until such time as the claimant proves all of the following, lawfully and in writing: ✦ THE THREE-PART LAWFUL TEST FOR STATUTORY CLAIMS Jurisdiction Without Consent That statutory jurisdiction lawfully applies to the living man without relying on circular reasoning, presumption, inference, or assumption which are themselves statutory mechanisms. Lawful Consent to Be Governed by Statute That I have lawfully consented to be governed by statute through a contract that includes: Full disclosure of my inalienable rights before contract, Voluntary, uncoerced agreement, Two wet signatures proving lawful joinder. Lawful Agreement to Represent Legal Fictions That I have knowingly and voluntarily agreed to represent either: The legal fiction “JASON BRIAN TYLDESLEY”, or The legal entity “Zen Jungle Retreat Ltd.” —and that such representation binds me to statutory obligations. Unless all three conditions are met and evidenced, there is no lawful cause for this claim to proceed, and any hearing or judgment would be ultra vires , void ab initio, and a breach of natural and common law. ✦ 4. Kofa v Oldham Cannot Lawfully Be Used to Establish Jurisdiction It is acknowledged that the claimant has cited Kofa v Oldham [2024] EWHC 685 (Admin) in an attempt to justify jurisdiction. That citation is fundamentally flawed and misapplied , and I now rebut its lawful relevance in full. ❌ Jurisdiction Was Never Under Challenge in That Case The matter in Kofa v Oldham involved a statutory dispute within an accepted statutory framework . The respondent in that case did not challenge jurisdiction , nor did he object to being subject to statute. The issue being examined was administrative process , not foundational consent or lawful joinder. As such: Jurisdiction was assumed , not proven. The court operated entirely within a statutory and administrative context . The judgment concerns enforcement procedure , not lawful application of jurisdiction to a living being . ❌ An Administrative Court Cannot Establish Jurisdiction Over a Living Man The High Court (Administrative Division) is not a court of record, nor a constitutional forum. It operates: Within statutory rules and public policy, On the assumption of statutory jurisdiction , And cannot rule on natural law, status, or common law supremacy . Therefore, its judgment has no lawful bearing on the question of whether statute can lawfully bind a living man without his consent . ❌ Presumption Cannot Establish Jurisdiction The judgment in Kofa is being misused as if it could prove that statutory obligations apply by default . This is a circular and unlawful argument . Presumption, assumption, and inference are statutory constructs . They cannot lawfully operate until after the living man has agreed to be bound by statute. Using statutory tools to justify the initial application of statute is a self-referential fallacy . ✅ Only Common Law Is the Default Jurisdiction The foundational lawful position is this: Common law is the only default jurisdiction of England and Wales. A man is born with inalienable rights , and bound to no authority by default. Statutory jurisdiction is contractual , and can only become operative when: Full disclosure is provided, Consent is given voluntarily, And the agreement is executed by two wet-ink signatures , evidencing joinder and lawful meeting of minds. This standard is not optional —it is the minimum threshold for any lawful contract to exist under common law. ❌ Companies House Is Misusing Kofa v Oldham in an Attempt to Mislead the Court It must be plainly stated that the use of Kofa v Oldham as proof of jurisdiction in this matter is not just irrelevant—it is an act of misrepresentation . It fails to address the actual points of proof required, It was introduced after a summons was unlawfully issued , without proof of claim or jurisdiction, And it has the effect of attempting to retroactively justify an unlawful process through unrelated precedent. If this case is allowed to stand as proof of jurisdiction, it would mean: That consent is no longer required, That inalienable rights are overridden by default, And that statutory authority is presumed superior to natural law . Such a position is not law. It is fiat. It is tyranny by assumption. ⚠️ Final Position: Kofa v Oldham cannot lawfully establish jurisdiction over a living man. It is an administrative ruling applied within accepted statutory context. Any reliance on it as proof of claim or jurisdiction over me, a living man, is rejected, and any further use may constitute fraud and misrepresentation. ✦ 5. Unlawful Restriction of Inalienable Rights by Indirect Means Let it be clear: my inalienable rights cannot be restricted without full disclosure and voluntary agreement under common law . The use of assumed statutory jurisdiction to impose obligations I have not consented to is an unlawful attempt to achieve by indirect means what cannot be lawfully done directly. ⚖ Legal maxim: “That which cannot be done directly cannot lawfully be done indirectly.” To bypass the requirement for consent by appealing to presumption is to commit fraud in equity and law. ✦ 6. Procedural Deficiency and Judicial Incompetence of Forum This court, being a Magistrates’ Court , is an administrative tribunal presided over by lay magistrates. It does not operate as a court of record, nor does it possess lawful jurisdiction to: Rule on foundational issues of jurisdiction, Determine the lawful standing of statute over a living man, Or adjudicate disputes involving inalienable rights. As such, this court cannot lawfully decide the matters raised in this notice. ✦ 7. Motion to Dismiss or Refer Accordingly, I hereby motion that: a) The matter be struck out entirely, due to: Lack of proven jurisdiction, Unlawful issuance of summons, Absence of claim, And failure to provide lawful evidence as previously requested. OR b) The matter be referred to a court of competent jurisdiction, capable of determining: The lawful applicability of statute to a living man, The limits of presumptive administrative authority, And the potential unlawful circumvention of inalienable rights. ✦ 8. Final Notice to All Parties This process now clearly demonstrates: That Companies House has failed to provide lawful proof of any claim; That no contract, consent, or joinder has been evidenced; And that their continued pursuit of administrative enforcement is made knowingly , with full notice. Let it be stated that this is not a game , nor a procedural formality. You are asked to enforce an obligation against a man with no proof of jurisdiction or lawful agreement, and to do so under the false guise of justice. Any such action is unlawful, dishonourable, and potentially criminal. ✦ 9. Invitation to Remedy For the avoidance of doubt and in service of transparency, I have enclosed as Schedule A a list of lawful questions relating to jurisdiction, consent, and authority. These questions outline the lawful standard of proof required before any statutory claim can proceed against a living man. I invite the court and Companies House to review these questions carefully and to provide clear, direct answers in honour and good faith. Until such questions are answered fully, no assumption of jurisdiction can be deemed lawful. I remain open to honourable resolution and request, once again, that: This matter be withdrawn in full, Or referred to a lawful court capable of hearing and ruling on the jurisdictional challenge. A response to this notice is requested within 7 days . All inalienable rights reserved. Without prejudice , By the living hand of: Jason : (Family Tyldesley) Living man under common law (Without joinder, without corporate status, without consent to statutory jurisdiction) Schedule A: Lawful Clarification of Jurisdiction, Authority, and Claim Presented in Honour for Lawful Consideration Appended to: Response to Correspondence, Rebuttal of Presumption, and Motion to Dismiss or Refer By: Jason : (Family Tyldesley) Date: 14 April 2025 ✦ Introduction (Opening Paragraph) The following questions are presented in honour, without prejudice, to aid all agents, officers, and parties in identifying the lawful requirements for establishing jurisdiction, claim, and consent in any statutory matter concerning a living man. These questions serve to clarify the lawful evidentiary standard required before any presumption of jurisdiction or obligation can proceed. Until all questions herein are lawfully answered in full, no lawful claim or enforcement can exist . ✦ SECTION 1: Inalienable Rights and Common Law Foundations Was I born equal to all other men and women, with no living being above me and no default obligations? Did I have inalienable rights at birth, and what are they? Have I ever been lawfully and explicitly informed of these rights? Under which jurisdiction do these inalienable rights exist, and how are they recognised in law? Is that jurisdiction the default lawful jurisdiction for all living beings? ✦ SECTION 2: Distinction Between Living Man and Legal Fiction Am I a living man, or a legal person? Does the concept of a person involve any limitation or alteration of the inalienable rights I have as a man? How can inalienable rights be lawfully limited or restricted, if at all? Does statute law represent a limitation or restriction on those rights? Is statute law applied to the living man, or to the legal fiction known as a person? Have I ever entered into a lawful, informed, voluntary contract agreeing to represent the person? If not, has such representation been presumed, assumed, or inferred without lawful agreement? If I apply for a licence or register a business, does this create a change in the jurisdiction I operate within? Does registration or licensing create obligations that would not otherwise exist under common law? Am I made aware that applying for a licence or registering a business may result in limitations to my inalienable rights? ✦ SECTION 3: Statutory Jurisdiction, Presumption, and Consent Is statute the default jurisdiction applied to a living being, or is it only applied by assumption, inference, or presumption? 16a. Can inalienable rights such as the right to trade or associate be lawfully limited by the absence of a licence or registration? 16b. If so, does that limitation require my prior informed consent through a lawful contract? 16c. Can a licence or registration requirement be enforced lawfully in the absence of contract, harm, or consent? Is presumption, assumption, or inference a statutory construct? Can such mechanisms lawfully operate before the living being has consented to statute? Can inalienable rights be lawfully restricted under common law by presumption or inference alone? Unless lawfully agreed otherwise, is common law the only lawful jurisdiction applicable to me? ✦ SECTION 4: Burden of Proof, Nature of Claim What is the nature of a crime under common law—does it require an injured party or measurable loss? Is there an injured party in this matter? If so, is that party the lawful claimant? Is this a statutory claim or a claim under common law? Can any statute be lawfully applied to me in the absence of a lawful, informed, common law contract with wet signatures and mutual consent—without relying on circular reasoning or statutory constructs? In any claim, who bears the burden of proof? If a claim is made under statute, must the claimant first prove that statutory jurisdiction lawfully applies to the respondent? If that cannot be proven, can any statutory claim be deemed lawful under common law? ✦ Closing Note These questions stand as the lawful standard of inquiry and evidence that must be satisfied before any assumption of authority, liability, or statutory obligation can be lawfully imposed upon a living man. Until each question is answered in full and lawful form, no claim, summons, enforcement, or obligation shall be considered valid or lawful . All inalienable rights reserved. Without prejudice , By the living hand of: Jason : (Family Tyldesley) Living man under common law Previous Item Next Item

Experience life-changing transformation at the Zen Jungle retreat in Devon UK. The butterfly program will awaken and transform your whole life by dissolving the cause of most mental health issues and changing your perspective on life. This is self realisation and finding the true self, to reveal freedom and inner peace. A holistic understanding of mental health It is important to understand mental health issues from a holistic perspective rather than the more common clinical descriptions and definitions. We are conceptual beings and we accumulate an almost infinite amount of polarised, subjective ideas about almost everything in our lives from birth. Those ideas then govern everything we think, say and do. They also control every reaction, action and behaviour, playing into each other in an incomprehensibly complex, inter-related way. All of the labels and patterns mentioned above are that system at work in slightly different ways, due to different combinations of ideas and attachments. In other words our individual idea based, subjective content drives patterns that psychology would have you label and differentiate. A person with a certain combination of ideas will think, react, speak and want what their ideas tell them, and though we may give a different name to each and every individual pattern, it is simply the nature of the stored ideas that act as the cause for the behaviours. This program exposes the underlying mechanism and makes clear how the ideas were made, attached to and what keeps them active as triggers, driving every thought, word and action. It will show beyond doubt that their content is the cause for all labelled patterns you may be experiencing, and more to the point it will enable the ideas that fuel your pattern to be dissolved. By working on the cause not the symptom and consolidating most mental health labels back to their common cause, these patterns can be holistically healed in more simple ways than you may currently believe. APPLY TO STAY BACK TO DETAILS BACK TO DETAILS Dissolve the root cause of mental health issues, and see life-changing results. Overthinking, Anxiety, Worry & Stress Busy lives with so much to do, be and have, leave us thinking endlessly and in frustrating circles. This pattern intrudes on our sleep and almost every other waking moment. Our minds are ever active creating future consequence and catastrophic scenarios, most of which never end up happening. The program reveals the cause, allowing you to learn to dissolve the fuel of it all at source. Recurrent Trauma Trauma is now a common and subjective term for ideas of significant past events we hold onto tightly and relive often in thought. As we attach importance and a defining role to them within our lives, we unconsciously create active thought triggers that make them recur. Trauma can be dissolved as we unlearn the habit of attachment and learn to let go of previous, attached beliefs. Addiction & Impulse Control Addiction is a symptom not a cause. It is a vehicle of escape for those who do not enjoy the way their lives feel when sober. Until life feels good, addiction remains. This process changes how we feel about life at the deepest level, and with new perspective will create a life you don't need to escape from. Loss, Grief, Death & Sadness Us humans have some very strong ideas about death and become very attached to and dependent on the the people around and close to us. It is now a social norm and widespread expectation to embed in ideas of loss, grief and loneliness when death or terminal illness is encountered. Your conditioned responses will dissolve with presence to reveal acceptance in the face of once difficult situations. Depression & Bipolar Both depression and bipolar represent us giving undue importance and truth to the ideas that would otherwise pass us by. Attachment is an unconscious habit that we are conditioned into. As the teachings will show, it can be easily unlearned and past attachements can be dissolved. Blame, Guilt & Victim Both blame and guilt can be debilitating. When we blame we also instantly take on the role of victim, holding a heavy role close. This process will show the debilitating nature of blame, including that of the self in guilt, and will allow the release and dissolving of past ideas of blame, creating freedom from being the joy sucking victim. Hopelessness & Suicidal thoughts We build our lives from subjective ideas and limiting beliefs, accumulating them over a lifetime. They become heavy, like an ultimate resistance that we often cannot bare. Hopelessness and the option of suicide is often the result, and we feel that nothing else will work. This process helps dissolve the ideas that cause that feeling of hopelessness.

THE MECHANISM OF THE MIND Learn the inner workings of your mind, and have it work for you not against you. A video and written mini-course The key learnings & benefits of this course: Gain a fundamental understanding of how your mind works The lessons you never had in school that could have freed you from a life-time of inner conflict. Learn what fuels thought and how to stop it Is it you who thinks or are the thoughts involuntary and random. As we learn the dynamics, we learn to control them. Understand the nature of belief and how it's created Whilst our beliefs may appear to be factual and solid, here we will learn how they are made and that they are dynamic in nature. Discover what makes triggers and involuntary thinking Most of us are affected by triggers but don't know why or if it's avoidable. As we understand what makes them we gain control. Understand how to stop overthinking Overthinking and anxiety are the new normal. You will learn how to be permanently free of them in this course. Learn how to passively dissolve limiting beliefs We live our whole lives within a set of beliefs that dictate what we can and can't, who we can be and what we can have. By passively dissolving them we become limitless. Course Details Unlock the full potential of your mind with our transformative program, *The Mechanism of the Mind - How to Make Your Mind Work for You, Not Against You*. This self-paced course is designed for individuals seeking to understand and harness the power of their minds to achieve greater freedom, peace, and personal growth. Through a series of insightful lessons and practical exercises, you will explore the intricate workings of the mind, identify and dissolve limiting beliefs, and learn techniques to reprogram your thought patterns for success. Our expert instructors will guide you on a journey of self-discovery, helping you to break free from mental constraints and unlock unlimited possibilities. Whether you are looking to improve your mental well-being, enhance your personal or professional life, or simply gain a deeper understanding of yourself, this program offers the tools and knowledge you need to make lasting changes. Join us and take the first step towards a more empowered and peaceful life. Enroll now and start your journey to mastering the mechanism of your mind. Section Overview Introduction You are the awareness You have access to two realities You're not the one thinking Importance, truth, attachment and triggers The externalisation of importance Becoming conscious & thought spirals How to set yourself free ONLY £59 BUY & ENROL NOW