2 bedroom luxury log cabin Next Cabin Previous Cabin Moon Beamer Moon Beamer Bifold doors span the front of this cabin, overlooking the hills, woodlands and valley with a modern, luxury feel. About this cabin Moon Beamer is a modern and elegant cabin with an open, spacious interior. Open up the bifold doors and bring the outside in to create a truly wild retreat experience. Bathe in a double ended tub under the stars on your own private deck or enjoy a spacious superking bed that can be separated into twin beds upon request. Every amenity is provided for with a fully equipped kitchen including an oven, microwave, dishwasher, fridge, freezer, hob and even a washing machine. This really is a place to relax into peace, with no TV to distract you can let go and unplug, taking some much needed time for yourself. Individually created for your comfort A double ended tub on a large, private decking and outdoor seating overlooking stunning views. Open up the bifold doors spanning the front of the cabin to bring nature to you. Back to Cabins CABIN AVAILABILITY Every cabin has the following : Large outdoor decked area Fully fitted kitchen High speed internet Free car parking (2 cars) Washing Machine Dishwasher Hob & Oven Power shower Fridge & Freezer No Television High threadcount linens EXPLORE THE RETREAT Your living spaces When it's time for bed All cabins include high threadcount linens and towels. CABIN AVAILABILITY Back to Cabins The retreat Explore the 40 acre retreat with 5 lakes, ancient woodland and so much nature. There are seating spaces and gardens leading to endless walks. Your bedroom Almost all cabin bedrooms have the option of king bed or conversion to twin. Bedding is high thread counts cottons on super comfy mattresses Bathroom Each cabin is equipped with a power shower for an invigourating experiences. Bathrooms are newly refitted and include fresh towels. Your kitchen Your kitchen has everything. Fridge, freezer, dishwasher, hob, oven microwave and so much storage, so they're great for stays long or short. Fire & Food We love fire and food. That's why the retreat has a large number of fire pit spaces, complete with dining area to use with friends or join other guests. Technology Though the retreat is all about disconnection, it's not about isolation. There's no TVs but there is fast internet in every cabin. Laundry Bedding and towels are all included but for the rest you have a washing machine in your cabin, theres airers available and a large dryer in the laundry. Bistro & Bar The newly built bistro bar and dining room will open fully soon but are available on request for drinks and as a great place to meet and eat. Outdoor spaces Your cabin has a large decked area complete with seating and dining space, some are connected with large bifold doors that bring outside in. So much more than a cabin stay... Your experience at zen jungle only begins when you book the cabin. Choose from a selection of free sessions including an meditations and introductions to presence. Facilities & Things to Do At the Retreat There's lots to do whiloe you're here. Explore the 5 lakes, woodland, amazing spaces and walks. Meditate or play table tennis in the Yin Yang, book a lakeside sauna, lake swim, visit the Eye bar and lounge or join scheduled or private sessions. Lake Swimming Guests are welcome to swim in our natural lakes, surrounded by quiet countryside and wildlife. Whether you're taking a mindful dip, floating in stillness, or enjoying a longer swim, lake swimming is a restorative experience. Firepits & Cookouts The land holds a variety of bespoke firepit spaces, available to hire for private cookouts or quiet evenings under the stars. These spaces invite connection with the elements, grounding, and deep relaxation after dark. Sauna & Lake Plunge For those seeking contrast and renewal, our wood-fired sauna is available for private hire, suitable for groups of 1-6. A powerful yet grounding way to reset the body and mind, all at your own pace, in a peaceful setting. The Eye Bar & Lounge A beautiful, indoor-outdoor space with panoramic views of the horizon and unforgettable sunets. Featuring a wood burning stove, relaxed lounge areas and alpine style decor, the bar invites comfort and connection. Yurt Cinema A cosy, boho styled lounge space designed for deep comfort. Warm and inviting, it features a large screen and plush sheepskin bean bags, making it the perfect setting to unwind with a good film. Available for private bookings. Nature & Wildlife Walks Explore over 40 acres of countryside, woodland and wild spaces, with 5 lakes and abundant wildlife woven through the land. Meandering paths invite slow walks and quiet reflection, to reconnect with yourself and nature. Private Wellness Sessions Book private, deeply personalised 1-1 or small group sessions, tailored to your needs. Offerings include Shamanic Breathwork, bespoke Sound Journeys, Introduction to Meditation, Yoga Nidra and more. Mindfulness & Meditation Take time for personal mindfulness or meditation during your stay. Practice in the Yin Yang Yurt with meditation cushions and yoga mats, or head to the Zenscape stage to sit by the stillness of the lake. Events & Retreats From sound ceremonies and shamanic breathwork to mindful day retreats, our events support rest, release, and reconnection. Enjoy space to slow down and return to balance through embodied, experiential practices. Table Tennis The Yin Yang Yurt offers a lighthearted space for movement and play, with table tennis available to all cabin guests in this open, indoor setting. A great way to stretch the body, lift energy and enjoy a moment of childlike fun. WHAT OUR GUESTS SAY

2 bedroom luxury log cabin Next Cabin Previous Cabin Star Seed Star Seed Find your peace with a view of the lake, panoramic decking and two en suite bedrooms. About this cabin Welcome to Star Seed, a luxurious log cabin nestled in a prime and secluded spot with breathtaking views of Freedom Lake. At Star Seed, you'll experience ultimate privacy and tranquility, as you're not overlooked. This cabin has been designed with your comfort in mind, ensuring that you have everything you need to feel at home. Star Seed features two en-suite bedrooms, both featuring king-sized beds and large shower areas. The living room and kitchen area are finished with expansive bifold doors, spanning the width of the cabin, which allow you to enjoy the stunning outdoors come rain or shine. The large decked area is the perfect place to relax and dine, while taking in the beautiful sunset views. Our kitchen is fully equipped with an oven, microwave, fridge, freezer, hob, washing machine, and dishwasher, providing you with every home comfort you could need during your stay. The cabin has been designed to provide a soft, confident, and personal experience, with an authentic tone that is awakened, spiritual, and human. Our goal is to provide you with a serene and peaceful retreat, where you can relax, unwind, and connect with nature. Individually created for your comfort Back to Cabins CABIN AVAILABILITY Every cabin has the following : Large outdoor decked area Fully fitted kitchen High speed internet Free car parking (2 cars) Washing Machine Dishwasher Hob & Oven Power shower Fridge & Freezer No Television High threadcount linens EXPLORE THE RETREAT Your living spaces When it's time for bed All cabins include high threadcount linens and towels. CABIN AVAILABILITY Back to Cabins The retreat Explore the 40 acre retreat with 5 lakes, ancient woodland and so much nature. There are seating spaces and gardens leading to endless walks. Your bedroom Almost all cabin bedrooms have the option of king bed or conversion to twin. Bedding is high thread counts cottons on super comfy mattresses Bathroom Each cabin is equipped with a power shower for an invigourating experiences. Bathrooms are newly refitted and include fresh towels. Your kitchen Your kitchen has everything. Fridge, freezer, dishwasher, hob, oven microwave and so much storage, so they're great for stays long or short. Fire & Food We love fire and food. That's why the retreat has a large number of fire pit spaces, complete with dining area to use with friends or join other guests. Technology Though the retreat is all about disconnection, it's not about isolation. There's no TVs but there is fast internet in every cabin. Laundry Bedding and towels are all included but for the rest you have a washing machine in your cabin, theres airers available and a large dryer in the laundry. Bistro & Bar The newly built bistro bar and dining room will open fully soon but are available on request for drinks and as a great place to meet and eat. Outdoor spaces Your cabin has a large decked area complete with seating and dining space, some are connected with large bifold doors that bring outside in. So much more than a cabin stay... Your experience at zen jungle only begins when you book the cabin. Choose from a selection of free sessions including an meditations and introductions to presence. Facilities & Things to Do At the Retreat There's lots to do whiloe you're here. Explore the 5 lakes, woodland, amazing spaces and walks. Meditate or play table tennis in the Yin Yang, book a lakeside sauna, lake swim, visit the Eye bar and lounge or join scheduled or private sessions. Lake Swimming Guests are welcome to swim in our natural lakes, surrounded by quiet countryside and wildlife. Whether you're taking a mindful dip, floating in stillness, or enjoying a longer swim, lake swimming is a restorative experience. Firepits & Cookouts The land holds a variety of bespoke firepit spaces, available to hire for private cookouts or quiet evenings under the stars. These spaces invite connection with the elements, grounding, and deep relaxation after dark. Sauna & Lake Plunge For those seeking contrast and renewal, our wood-fired sauna is available for private hire, suitable for groups of 1-6. A powerful yet grounding way to reset the body and mind, all at your own pace, in a peaceful setting. The Eye Bar & Lounge A beautiful, indoor-outdoor space with panoramic views of the horizon and unforgettable sunets. Featuring a wood burning stove, relaxed lounge areas and alpine style decor, the bar invites comfort and connection. Yurt Cinema A cosy, boho styled lounge space designed for deep comfort. Warm and inviting, it features a large screen and plush sheepskin bean bags, making it the perfect setting to unwind with a good film. Available for private bookings. Nature & Wildlife Walks Explore over 40 acres of countryside, woodland and wild spaces, with 5 lakes and abundant wildlife woven through the land. Meandering paths invite slow walks and quiet reflection, to reconnect with yourself and nature. Private Wellness Sessions Book private, deeply personalised 1-1 or small group sessions, tailored to your needs. Offerings include Shamanic Breathwork, bespoke Sound Journeys, Introduction to Meditation, Yoga Nidra and more. Mindfulness & Meditation Take time for personal mindfulness or meditation during your stay. Practice in the Yin Yang Yurt with meditation cushions and yoga mats, or head to the Zenscape stage to sit by the stillness of the lake. Events & Retreats From sound ceremonies and shamanic breathwork to mindful day retreats, our events support rest, release, and reconnection. Enjoy space to slow down and return to balance through embodied, experiential practices. Table Tennis The Yin Yang Yurt offers a lighthearted space for movement and play, with table tennis available to all cabin guests in this open, indoor setting. A great way to stretch the body, lift energy and enjoy a moment of childlike fun. WHAT OUR GUESTS SAY

The Sovereign Community Imagine a life where . . . Working five or six days a week for money was no longer needed The food you eat you grew yourself — natural, alive, without chemicals There was no control and extraction by a system you never agreed to Your children were present in your life and learned real skills for independence Competition, comparison, and the race to survive was over The people around you were peaceful and stable, with little or no conflict Buying things, going places, or being in relationships weren't what you used to feel good Everyone contributed what they could, willingly, without keeping score Connection and time — with children, with community, for yourself — was the norm, not a weekend reward Your home and land were held in trust, outside the reach of external authorities Health came from how you lived, not from dependency on a medical system Education meant real learning — capability, wisdom, presence — not conditioning for compliance Decisions were made with clarity and care, not through conflict or control Inner peace was your foundation, not something you chased and never caught You woke each day without anxiety, without the weight of a life that doesn't fit Time expanded rather than contracted, and there was space to simply be This is not fantasy. It's what we're building. Here's what we're creating A sovereign community on 40 acres of natural land in Devon, England — lakes, woodland, space to breathe. A place where people live differently, outside the extractive systems of the old paradigm. But this is not just a location. It's a way of living built on specific foundations: With Inner Peace As A Foundation Most intentional communities fail because people bring their conditioning with them. The conflict doesn't end — it just moves location. We take a different approach. Inner transformation is not optional here — it's what makes everything else possible. Through awakening, meditation, direct inquiry, and the dissolution of limiting beliefs, we establish peace as the foundation. When the inner work is done, conflict dissolves. Decisions become clear. Contribution flows naturally. This is why we created the Butterfly Program — a 14+ night transformational retreat that establishes this foundation through teachings, meditation training, breathwork, and conscious practice. For most, this is where the journey begins. A life of contribution not extraction Everyone contributes according to their capacity — skills, labour, care, presence. What is given is given freely, not measured or transacted. The work that sustains the community is shared. No one is exhausted by it. No one bears it alone. And effort goes directly toward the life you're living — not disappearing into distant systems that give nothing back. Self Sufficient And Sovereign Living naturally : We grow food. We steward land. We build capability across the community so that nothing restricted or absent creates crisis. Internal power, and pure, clean water : We have the largest private solar generation system in the UK, and almost unlimited private water, pumped from our well by our own solar energy. Independence, a core foundation: Whilst the societal system fosters dependency, and is restricting the farming community to the point of non-operation, we are establishing true independence. We understand law : We are not legal persons, so they and the assets they hold are held in private trust. This means we are outside what others call law, and beyond external interference. We live the alternate path, the true reality of natural law and equity. where all living beings are equal and free. Find out more. Natural Law is simple : it means do no harm, cause no loss, honour agreements. Simple principles that need no enforcement because they arise from clear seeing. Exit of the system : Whilst we do interface with the old systems where necessary, we do so at a distance and under explicit, lawful reservation. We are not persons, and are not agents for them. Independence from "the system": Our aim is to build a life that requires nothing from them and with no obligation to them. Meaning we are not subject to statute law. Knowledge of law : This foundational learning requires dissolution of conditioned beliefs, and understanding of the mechanisms by which control and extraction have been imposed on a global population. Visit notaperson.org for more on that, it's the best source of law and truth. Food Starts With Us Garden Gems Veggie Patch Picks Orchard Treasures Over 100 Fruit Trees Dairy Coming Soon Milk and Cheese Meat & Eggs Livestock Expanding Pantry Pleasers Preserves, Pickles and More Raising Free Children Children here don't disappear into institutions. They're present, included, learning real skills by doing real things. Interacting with their mothers, fathers and the community as a whole equally. A two-year-old scatters seeds. A three-year-old collects eggs. An eight-year-old maintains tools. They learn where food comes from by growing it or raising it. They learn responsibility and life by having it, and living it. And they grow up in a group that far exceeds their birth mother and father as mentors and who are actually present — not exhausted remnants returning from jobs, but available, unhurried, always there. Time Restored, Life Returned The hours previously sold to employers and the system remain with us. The hours lost to commuting, preparation and recovery — returned. The hours spent acquiring what the community now organically provides — returned. What do we do with this time? Whatever life asks for. Time with children. Time in community. Time alone. Time in nature. Not as reward but as the texture of daily existence. It’s literally life by a new calendar, no day names, no endless repetition — new and precious moments, endlessly arriving Governance By Clarity, Not Authority When the inner work is done, something remarkable becomes possible. Ideas are considered on merit: Does this serve the whole group and space? Is this efficient? What are the consequences? The question isn't "whose idea is this?" but "is this good?" This isn't consensus (which becomes paralysis) or democracy (which becomes majority rule) or autocracy (which becomes tyranny). It's simply clarity — seeing what works, without ego-investment in outcomes. A Community Of Peace & Practice An Organic, Integrated Path Daily meditation. Conscious communication. Service with presence. Ongoing inquiry into the beliefs that generate conflict. A path toward dissolution and ongoing exit from a false conditioned existence. This isn't imposed from outside — it arises naturally when people recognise that peace is the foundation of everything good. Because the Old World Is Ending This isn't ideology. It's observation. The financial system buckles under unsustainable debt and artificial currency. What seems stable is built on foundations that cannot hold. And it doesn’t have too long to run now. Employment destabilises as AI and automation render traditional jobs obsolete. The thing we were conditioned to do — work to survive — is being removed from beneath us. Healthcare breaks down as chronic illness rises and the pharmaceutical model reaches its limits. Education is revealed as conditioning to be controlled, for a world that no longer exists — training compliant workers for jobs that are imminently disappearing. Food systems show their threats and fragility — centralised, chemicalised, dependent on supply chains that can break.Farmers being marginalised out of existence, and with them majority access to independent food sources. Governments are exposed and lose legitimacy as their unlawful attachment and overreach becomes undeniable. And this is a non-local, global shift. When Collapse is Not Catastrophe It's the completion of a cycle. What was built on control, extraction, and dependency is now visible and ending — and what was always natural is simply re-emerging. The question is not whether this transition is happening. The question is whether you'll be prepared for it. Independence means: Not being dependent on outside for inner happiness Not being distracted by organised narratives Not being divided by inner conflict and the stories outside Not needing the job that soon might not exist Not needing the monetary system that is set to collapse Not depending on supply chains that might break Not relying on systems that take more than they give Having skills, community, and land that sustain you regardless This is not survivalism or fear. It's clarity about where things are heading — and building something better before you need it. THERE ARE SEVERAL WAYS TO START Choose Your Path Learn True Law Freedom starts by understanding the basics of law. Do that here. VISITS NOTAPERSON.ORG Butterfly Program Explore the foundational process of finding inner peace as a retreat BUTTERFLY PROGRAM Apply For Community Start the process by doing our online reflection to expose your readiness. START ENTRY PROCESS

Are You Considering Joining Us? The Zen Jungle Community is a new paradigm of living and essentially a way of life. It is truly different from the life most people are currently leading within society. That's why joining us must be considered on a deeper level and is a progressive process. We have seen what works and what doesn't, so we focus on understanding reflection to allow self selection. Community membership moves forward on truth and by setting real expectations. There is no idealism, and this is not for those seeking the next external thing in a long list, they hope will make them happy. It starts with the realisation that joy is internal, and only inner peace can be the foundation of a great conflict free community. If you haven't read our "About Our Sovereign Community" Page, Please start with that. ABOUT OUR COMMUNITY Understanding the integration process Becoming part of this community is not like applying for a job or joining a club. It is a process of mutual discovery — you discovering whether this is truly your path, and us discovering whether you are genuinely aligned with what is being built here. This process unfolds in stages: Online Suitability Reflection: This is an interesting journey toward a better understanding of your own motivations and the underlying truth of your choice to join. It's an interesting AI hosted conversation that will expose lots to you, and to us if and when you are suggested to go to the next stage. It may take over an hour and is accessed below. Initial Contact and Conversation : Once the reflection is complete we will connect on a call to chat, and to get to know each other. This is not an interview — it is an open discussion. Visit, then a short (2-3 Week) stay : Visit for the day to meet us, then where there's mutual alignment, stay for a few weeks at a low community resident cabin rate. This is an opportunity to spend time here on the land and with the people, and to experience the reality of what is being created. It's also an opportunity to contribute to community life, and engage with the ongoing teachings and practices. The "Move-In" Integration Period : For those who enjoy the community and wish to proceed, the next stage is to stay for an integration period of 6-12 months. During this time, you live on the land as part of the community, and participate fully in its life and practices. The integration period requires a low cabin rental to cover costs and includes: Continuous residence on the land Participation in daily community life and contribution Regular attendance at meditation sessions Engagement with pointing sessions and direct inquiry Sincere work with the awakening pathway Demonstration of alignment with community values Development of positive relationships with existing members During or at the conclusion of this period, a decision is made both by the community and by you — about whether permanent residence in the community is right for you. This is formalised by you vesting in the private trust and becoming a full resident beneficiary. (This process will be explained at the appropriate time). Your Next Steps Consider these Questions First to Get Started Before proceeding further, sit with these questions. Not to answer them correctly, but to discover what is actually true for you. About the inner work: Are you genuinely willing to examine your own beliefs, even the ones you're most attached to? Can you sit in stillness without needing distraction? When conflict arises, do you look inward first or outward first? Are you willing to be wrong about things you've been certain of? About contribution: What do you have to offer? What skills, what capacity, what willingness? Can you work without recognition? Without your contribution being measured against others? Are you able to receive feedback and direction without defensiveness? Can you do necessary work that isn't your preference? About community: How do you respond when others disagree with you? Can you live closely with people who see things differently? Are you able to let go of being right in service of harmony? Do you genuinely wish well for others' flourishing, or is it conditional? About transition: What are you leaving behind? Are you at peace with that? Are you prepared for a fundamental change in how you live, not just where? Do you have dependents or obligations that need to be considered? Is this timing right, or are you rushing toward something? About honesty: Reading all of this, does something in you recognise it as true? Or does it sound appealing but not quite real? Are you attracted to the image or to the actual work involved? If you knew it would be harder than you imagine, would you still proceed? If this is your path, you will know The description of the current paradigm resonates deeply — you have felt this truth in your own life The emphasis on inner work feels right, not burdensome You recognise that your own conditioning needs attention You feel called rather than just interested You have been moving in this direction already, in your own way Reading this creates not just excitement but something quieter — recognition You understand this is a beginning, not an arrival Unsure? - Signs it may not be for you The inner work sounds like something to tolerate in order to get the lifestyle You want the peace without the process You are primarily motivated by escaping something rather than moving toward something The self-assessment questions created more defensiveness than inquiry You want to bring your current beliefs and have them accommodated You see this as one option among many lifestyle choices The emphasis on non-judgement and releasing "being right" feels threatening There is no judgement in recognising this isn't your path. The recognition itself is wisdom. Ready? - Start the Online Reflection We have created an interesting and detailed AI process for self reflection, that will help you understand if the community is right for you. It will also help us to understand if you are ready for community life. The process acts as a mirror, and so really is useful no matter what you choose to do on completion. It will give an honest view of where you are on your transformational journey and brings lots to reflect upon. It may take up to 2 hours, but is well worth the time. Once complete, those who fit the community will be invited to the community for a visit. SUITABILITY PROCESS

Drinks & Pizza at the Bistro bar | Sneak preview for friends & neighbours. Join us in our brand new panoramic, inside, outside bar and dining room for the first preview opening! A night of drinks, laughter and good company for those local to the area to celebrate the start of something exciting. 2 June 2023 Weekly Butterflies Zoom Call A get together and follow up coaching, free for all butterflies. 7 June 2023 4 Night Mindfulness Retreat Find space and a quiet mind with 4 days of mindfulness, meditation, breathwork and yoga nidra. Includes a luxury, self catered cabin stay (shared or private) and one outdoor cookout with food and drinks included. 8 June 2023 Weekly Butterflies Zoom Call A get together and follow up coaching, free for all butterflies 14 June 2023 4 Night Mindfulness Retreat Find space and a quiet mind with 4 days of mindfulness, meditation, breathwork and yoga nidra. Includes a luxury, self catered cabin stay (shared or private) and one outdoor cookout with food and drinks included. 6 July 2023 NEW MOON | 10 Day Life Changing Transformation Retreat Awaken to a whole new perspective on life and truly love it for the first time. Find a blissful, inner peace that brings both happiness and freedom by learning the secret to dissolving all overthinking, trauma, relationship issues, triggers, addiction, low self opinion, insecurity and hopelessness. 14 July 2023 Is it for me Weekly ZOOM call Find out if the personal transformation is for you. Ask questions and learn how it works with Jason and Hannah 27 July 2023 Weekly Butterflies Zoom Call A get together and follow up coaching, free for all butterflies 29 July 2023 Volunteer and workaway introduction zoom call An opportunity to stay and learn in a transformational retreat for free with an energy exchange. Maybe you could even join the community. This is the zoom call to explain it all. 30 July 2023 Weekly Butterflies Zoom Call A get together and follow up coaching, free for all butterflies 1 August 2023 Is it for me Weekly ZOOM call Find out if the personal transformation is for you. Ask questions and learn how it works with Jason and Hannah 2 August 2023 4 Night Mindfulness Retreat Find space and a quiet mind with 4 days of mindfulness, meditation, breathwork and yoga nidra. Includes a luxury, self catered cabin stay (shared or private) and one outdoor cookout with food and drinks included. 3 August 2023 EXPLORE THINGS TO DO

Notices & Declarations Previous Item Next Item 25 July 2025 Public Notice, Companies House, Cardiff Magistrates Court Affidavit of Truth & Court of Record Affidavit, Notice ZJR-Companies House AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH, COURT OF RECORD, AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE WITHOUT PREJUDICE Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent From: Jason : (Family Tyldesley) Wooda Lakes, Pancrasweek, Holsworthy, Devon, EX22 7JN To: Huw Morgan – Legal Adviser, Cardiff Magistrates’ Court Cardiff Magistrates’ Court, Fitzalan Place, Cardiff, CF24 0RZ Louise Smyth CBE – Chief Executive Officer, Companies House Jamie Phillips – Agent, Companies House Pete Cowan – Prosecuting Officer, Companies House Lee Jenkins – Prosecuting Officer, Companies House Date: 25th July 2025 Court Reference : 2500056578 Company Nos: 12763398 & 12758334 OPENING STATEMENT I, Jason : (Family Tyldesley), a living man born of woman, make this affidavit in my natural, private capacity under common law, with full knowledge and intent. I convene this Court of Record under common law for the purpose of establishing truth and creating a perpetual judicial memorial of the unrebutted facts, defaults, and liabilities arising from the claims and actions of Companies House and Cardiff Magistrates’ Court in relation to me and associated legal fictions. At its core, this matter raises the most fundamental question in law: how does one being, born equal and free upon the earth, gain lawful authority over another? What is presented as the routine enforcement of legislation is, in truth, the assertion of authority by one group of beings (government officers) over another equal being. The only lawful mechanism by which such authority can be exercised is through voluntary, informed, contractual agreement. Absent such agreement, any enforcement of statute against a living man or woman constitutes unlawful trespass. It is the truth of this case that no lawful jurisdiction has ever been proven , despite multiple good‑faith opportunities provided through conditional acceptances and notices of challenge. The continued pursuit of claims, penalties, and orders in the absence of proven jurisdiction constitutes a direct and knowing trespass upon my inalienable rights — rights which the justice system and its officers are sworn to uphold. Companies House, being a legal fiction, cannot act of itself. All actions in its name are executed by living men and women, who now act in their private capacity and therefore bear full personal and commercial liability for trespass, misrepresentation, coercion, and fraud under colour of law. Any man or woman wishing to challenge this Court of Record must do so by sworn affidavit , under full commercial and personal liability, within fourteen (14) days of service. Failure to rebut under oath constitutes agreement to the facts and liabilities set out herein. 1. DECLARATION OF STATUS I, Jason : (Family Tyldesley), a living man born of woman, affirm from my own firsthand knowledge that the facts herein are true, correct, and made in good faith. I hold inalienable rights which cannot be transferred, waived, or removed except by explicit, voluntary, and informed agreement. I am not, and do not consent to act as, the legal fiction “JASON BRIAN TYLDESLEY” or any other corporate/artificial entity. I do not recognise the presumption of statutory jurisdiction over my living being in the absence of lawful, fully informed, and voluntary joinder. I retain all rights, remedies, and freedoms under common law. 1A. CONVENING A COURT OF RECORD This affidavit, being sworn and witnessed, constitutes a sovereign Court of Record under common law . By swearing and witnessing these truths, I convene a lawful court of record, recognised in English common law as the highest form of testimony. As Sir William Blackstone stated in Commentaries on the Laws of England (Book III, Ch. 23): “A court of record is that where the acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled for a perpetual memorial and testimony.” This means: These statements now stand as judicial record . Any unrebutted facts within this affidavit become binding in law. Only a higher court of record (or sworn rebuttal under oath by a competent man or woman) may challenge these statements. Thus, this affidavit is not merely correspondence — it is a living court of record , convened to establish truth, resolve controversy, and protect rights. Any man or woman who fails to rebut these sworn statements under oath agrees to their truth by acquiescence. 1B. ON LAW, LEGALISM, AND MISUSE OF THE TERM “PSEUDO‑LEGAL” The responses from Companies House — particularly those of Prosecutor Pete Cowan — demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding and conflation of concepts: treating the administration of legislation (“what is legal”) as though it were law itself. True law precedes and underpins all legislative acts. It rests on inalienable rights, the equality of all beings, and the principle that no one may exercise authority over another absent voluntary, informed agreement. Statutes are subordinate administrative rules which only apply by consent or contract. To dismiss reliance upon these lawful principles as “pseudo‑legal” is to reveal a failure to distinguish between law (the immutable foundation binding all) and legalism (the internal mechanisms of a legislative system). This conflation undermines justice and obscures the real issue at hand: by what lawful authority do you act against me, a living man? This Court of Record clarifies that this matter is not about technical statutory compliance. It is about the lawful basis — or absence thereof — for asserting authority over an equal being. 2. DETAILED CHRONOLOGY OF CLAIMS, NOTICES, AND UNREBUTTED TRUTHS 26 May 2022 – Companies House (Statutory Notice) Recipient: Myself. Response: Statutory notice of overdue accounts for period ending 31/07/2021, threatening penalties and prosecution. Unrebutted Truth: Administrative threat; no proof of lawful authority or contract. 13 September 2022 – Conditional Acceptance & Proof of Claim Request Recipient: Louise Smyth (Companies House) & Jim Harra (HMRC). Response: Conditional acceptance of Companies House and HMRC claims, subject to detailed proof (17‑point request covering contract, jurisdiction, lawful authority, and use of funds). Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal or sworn evidence; Companies House and HMRC placed on notice of personal liability. 11 October 2022 – Response to Gazette Notices Recipient: Louise Smyth (Companies House). Response: Challenged First Gazette notices for strike‑off as clerical error; reiterated non‑consent to statutory authority and asserted right to trade. Demanded withdrawal of strike‑off and lawful basis for obligations. Unrebutted Truth: No lawful response or withdrawal provided; strike‑off actions proceeded absent rebuttal. 10 May 2023 – Companies House (Overdue Accounts Notice) Recipient: Myself. Response: Overdue accounts notice warning of penalties and prosecution. Unrebutted Truth: Administrative threat; no proof of authority provided. 24 May 2023 – Conditional Acceptance & Full Proof of Claim Request Recipient: Louise Smyth (Companies House). Response: Detailed conditional acceptance of all Companies House claims, challenging authority to compel obligations without proven voluntary consent. Required signed proof of contract, evidence of lawful authority, and meeting of minds. Unrebutted Truth: No lawful rebuttal; Companies House failed to meet the 21‑day deadline, leaving claims unproven. 21 June 2023 – Jamie Phillips (Compliance Response) Recipient: Myself. Response: Reiterated Companies Act duties and penalties; refused to address jurisdictional challenge. Unrebutted Truth: Dismissal, not rebuttal; no lawful proof of claim provided. 11 July 2023 – Follow‑Up & Stop Dissolution Demand Recipient: Louise Smyth & Jamie Phillips (Companies House). Response: Reiterated conditional acceptance, demanded cessation of dissolution actions and proof of lawful authority. Highlighted lack of consent to statutory obligations and challenged their claims of automatic penalties. Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal or proof provided; estoppel by silence continues. 20 January 2024 – Companies House (Gazette & Compliance Letters) Recipient: Myself. Response: Further Gazette strike‑off notices and compliance threats addressed to “THE DIRECTORS.” Unrebutted Truth: Administrative notices; no lawful authority proven. 24 January 2024 – Third Notice to Prove Claim & Liability Warning Recipient: Louise Smyth & Jamie Phillips (Companies House). Response: Third notice demanding proof of lawful authority and consent; warned of accumulating personal liability for unlawful actions, coercion, and trespass. Unrebutted Truth: No lawful rebuttal; personal liability for all named agents stands. 13 September 2024 – Companies House (Warning Letters) Recipient: Myself. Response: Further compliance notices for Zen Jungle entities. Unrebutted Truth: Administrative warning; no lawful rebuttal or proof of authority. 9 December 2024 – Further Notice Regarding Lawful Basis Recipient: Jamie Phillips & Louise Smyth (Companies House). Response: Challenged Companies House assertion that “the registrar has no need to prove lawfulness”; reaffirmed conditional acceptance and demand for proof of lawful authority and evidence of contract. Unrebutted Truth: No lawful rebuttal or evidence provided. 3 December 2024 – Companies House (Prosecution Threat) Recipient: Myself. Response: Compliance & Enforcement instructs prosecuting solicitor to begin criminal proceedings. Unrebutted Truth: Administrative threat; no lawful rebuttal or jurisdictional proof provided. 27 December 2024 – Conditional Acceptance Recipient: Jamie Phillips & Louise Smyth (Companies House). Response: Conditional acceptance of Companies House claims upon proof of jurisdiction, lawful authority, and contract with two wet signatures. Unrebutted Truth: No lawful evidence provided. Companies House placed on notice of personal liability for misrepresentation. 28 January 2025 – Final Conditional Acceptance Recipient: Jamie Phillips & Louise Smyth (Companies House). Response: Reaffirmed conditional acceptance for all Companies House obligations relating to me or associated entities, demanded lawful proof of authority and contract. Unrebutted Truth: No lawful evidence provided; standing estoppel begins. 3 February 2025 – Lee Jenkins (Prosecution Warning) Recipient: Myself. Response: Notification of imminent prosecution, with summons date set for 28 March 2025. Unrebutted Truth: Administrative threat; no lawful evidence of authority or consent provided. 4 March 2025 – Jurisdictional Challenge & Demand for Proof Recipient: Lee Jenkins (Companies House). Response: Challenged Companies House statutory claims, demanded evidence of jurisdiction over the living man and proof of consent. Unrebutted Truth: No lawful rebuttal; unrebutted allegations of coercion and misrepresentation. 12 March 2025 – Pete Cowan (Prosecution Letter) Recipient: Myself. Response: Confirms authorisation of prosecution; states that my reliance on common law jurisdiction has “no basis in law.” Unrebutted Truth: Dismissal, not rebuttal; no sworn affidavit or lawful proof provided. 19 March 2025 – Final Notice & Revocation of Assumed Authority Recipient: Pete Cowan (Companies House). Response: Rejected fraudulent summons and demanded strict proof of claim and lawful authority. Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal; unrebutted allegations of fraud and malicious prosecution. 25 March 2025 – Pete Cowan (Prosecution Warning) Recipient: Myself. Response: Confirms trial will proceed absent filings by 28 March 2025. Unrebutted Truth: No engagement with jurisdiction challenge. 16 April – 16 May 2025 – Series of Prosecutor’s Letters Recipient: Myself and the Court. Response: Multiple letters from Pete Cowan, Companies House Prosecutor, dismissing my lawful notices as “pseudo‑legal” and repeatedly citing Kofa v Oldham [2024] EWHC 685 (Admin) as justification for proceeding without my consent. These letters indicated an intention to proceed even in my absence. Unrebutted Truth: These communications did not meet the standards of lawful rebuttal — they were neither sworn affidavits nor responsive to the specific points raised in my notices. A full rebuttal to the misapplication of Kofa v Oldham has already been provided in my prior correspondence, leaving the matter unrebutted and the estoppel intact. 14 April 2025 – Final Conditional Acceptance & Jurisdiction Challenge Recipient: Cardiff Magistrates’ Court (Clerk to the Justices) & Companies House prosecutors. Response: Final conditional acceptance of all claims pending proof of jurisdiction and a lawful contract showing voluntary, informed consent. Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal or evidence provided. 22–25 May 2025 – Additional Prosecution Letters Recipient: Myself. Response: Further prosecution communications from Lee Jenkins and Pete Cowan reiterating intent to proceed under Companies Act duties. Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal; estoppel continues. 28 May 2025 – Final Notice of Estoppel & Jurisdictional Default Recipient: Cardiff Magistrates’ Court (Clerk to the Justices) & Companies House prosecutors. Response: Declared estoppel by conduct and silence after repeated failure to rebut prior notices; objected to unlawful trial and confirmed jurisdictional default. Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal received. Estoppel now binding. 3 June 2025 – Notice of Non‑Consent & Final Reminder Recipient: Cardiff Magistrates’ Court. Response: Reaffirmed non‑consent to proceedings and restated estoppel; reminded court of default and that no lawful jurisdiction had been proven. Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal provided. 6 June 2025 – Matthew Griffiths (Court Officer) Recipient: Myself. Response: Administrative court notice regarding case progression. Unrebutted Truth: No lawful rebuttal to notices; purely administrative. 8 June 2025 – Resubmission of Final Notice Recipient: Cardiff Magistrates’ Court. Response: Resubmitted Final Notice of Non‑Consent and Estoppel after Cardiff Civil & Family Justice Centre returned it in error; confirmed lawful service. Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal provided. 12 June 2025 – Cardiff Magistrates’ Court (Administrative Notice) Recipient: Myself. Response: Court notice confirming enforcement proceedings. Unrebutted Truth: Administrative escalation; no engagement with jurisdiction. 20 June 2025 – Final Notice of Unlawful Administration Recipient: Cardiff Magistrates’ Court. Response: Rejected and dismissed unlawful orders and penalties issued by the court for want of jurisdiction; warned of personal liability for enforcement. Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal received; liability now personal and commercial. 23 June 2025 – Final Personal Liability Notice & Commercial Lien Recipient: Louise Smyth CBE, Jamie Phillips, Pete Cowan & Lee Jenkins (Companies House). Response: Imposed a personal commercial lien of £1,250,000 per agent for fraudulent misrepresentation, trespass, malfeasance, coercion, and harm. Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal; lien stands by acquiescence. 3 July 2025 – Huw Morgan (Legal Adviser) Recipient: Myself. Response: Letter dismissing my lawful notices as having “no legal effect.” Unrebutted Truth: Dismissal, not rebuttal; no sworn affidavit or proof of authority. 8 July 2025 – Final Notice of Personal Liability & Schedule of Trespass Recipient: Companies House officers and court officials. Response: Issued a detailed Schedule of Trespass and Penalties (minimum £1,250,000 per individual) with 14 days to rebut or cure. Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal provided; schedule accepted by acquiescence. 11 July 2025 – Cardiff Magistrates’ Court (Further Steps Notice) Recipient: Myself. Response: Administrative notice threatening enforcement. Unrebutted Truth: Administrative threat; no lawful rebuttal. 17 July 2025 – Huw Morgan (Legal Adviser) Recipient: Myself. Response: Final letter asserting intent to proceed; no engagement with jurisdictional challenge. Unrebutted Truth: Purely dismissive; estoppel by silence stands. 21 July 2025 – Final Conditional Acceptance & Personal Liability Notice Recipient: Huw Morgan (Cardiff Magistrates’ Court). Response: Conditionally accepted “Further Steps Notice” upon lawful proof of contract and jurisdiction; warned of trespass and personal liability for continued misrepresentation. Unrebutted Truth: No rebuttal or lawful evidence provided. 25 July 2025 – Affidavit of Truth & Court of Record Recipients: Cardiff Magistrates’ Court (Huw Morgan) & Companies House officers. Response: Convened a Court of Record, consolidating all unrebutted notices, liens, and estoppels into judicial record; provided final opportunity to cure by sworn affidavit and evidence of jurisdiction. Unrebutted Truth: This affidavit now stands as judicial record, unrebutted and binding in law. 2A: COMPLETION OF DEFAULT, ESTOPPEL, AND COMMERCIAL LIEN By the unrebutted sequence of notices, conditional acceptances, and liability declarations detailed in Section 2, the following now stand as lawful and binding: Estoppel by Conduct and Silence – All parties named herein have been given ample opportunity to rebut my notices, provide lawful proof of jurisdiction, or demonstrate a voluntary, informed contract granting lawful authority. No such rebuttals, affidavits, or lawful evidence have been received. Accordingly, estoppel by conduct and silence is now complete. Standing Commercial Liens – The personal liability and commercial liens served on Louise Smyth, Jamie Phillips, Pete Cowan, Lee Jenkins, and any other agents acting in this matter are unrebutted. These liens, including the Schedule of Trespass dated 8 July 2025, now stand as lawful, enforceable debts in the sum of £1,250,000 per individual (joint and several). Judgment by Acquiescence – By failure to rebut on point and under oath, the facts, claims, and penalties set out in my notices are admitted by acquiescence and now stand as judgment by estoppel in this Court of Record. Ongoing Trespass and Liability – Any further action to enforce void orders, penalties, or statutory claims against me constitutes knowing trespass, fraud by misrepresentation, and coercion under colour of law. Each additional act will incur further personal and commercial liability, enforceable in law and equity. 3. STATEMENT OF UNREBUTTED TRUTH No lawful rebuttal, under oath or otherwise, has been received to any of my notices, challenges, or conditional acceptances. Accordingly, by the legal and lawful maxims: He who does not deny, admits. ( Qui non negat, fatetur ). An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. That which is not lawful to do directly cannot be done indirectly. ( Co. Litt. 223 ). As also affirmed in Bunbury v Fuller (1853) : “Where jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven and not assumed.” And in Macfoy v United Africa Co (1961) : “A proceeding without jurisdiction is a nullity.” The facts set out above now stand as truth in law and commerce, creating a lawful estoppel. 4: STATEMENT OF TRESPASS, HARM, AND CRIMINALITY Despite my lawful challenges: Companies House agents and solicitors continued to pursue claims without proving jurisdiction, contract, or consent. Cardiff Magistrates’ Court issued administrative orders and threats of enforcement despite no proven jurisdiction and no rebuttal to my conditional acceptances. Enforcement threats now include seizure of property, trespass, and conversion without lawful process. These actions constitute trespass, coercion, conversion, and misfeasance under colour of law , contrary to the principles in Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98, which affirms that public officials must prove lawful authority for any interference with property or rights. At the heart of these wrongs lies the absence of any voluntary, informed contract by which I consented to be bound by the Companies Act or to act as surety for any legal fiction. To proceed against a living man absent such contract is to assert unlawful dominion over an equal being. All officers of Companies House and Cardiff Magistrates’ Court are reminded: You are public trustees sworn to uphold the inalienable rights of living men and women. Magistrates’ Judicial Oath (Courts Act 2003): “I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will.” Civil Service Code : “To uphold the law, and act with integrity, honesty, objectivity and impartiality.” To proceed in defiance of these obligations constitutes misfeasance in public office and renders you personally liable. 5. SCHEDULE OF TRESPASS AND PENALTIES As served in my unrebutted notices dated 8 July 2025, the following liabilities stand: Fraudulent Misrepresentation – £250,000 Trespass to Rights and Property – £250,000 Malfeasance in Public Office – £250,000 Unlawful Harassment and Coercion – £250,000 Personal Injury: Mental Duress and Threatened Harm – £250,000 Total per individual: £1,250,000 (joint and several). 6. OPPORTUNITY TO CURE You are hereby given 14 calendar days from the date of service of this affidavit to provide: A sworn affidavit from a competent party providing: Evidence of lawful jurisdiction over me, a living man; A fully disclosed, voluntary, and signed contract (two wet signatures) evidencing my consent to be bound by statute or represent the legal fiction. A lawful rebuttal to all points raised in this affidavit and the chronology set out herein. Failure to provide the above within the specified period will constitute final default, dishonour, and tacit acquiescence. 7. NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND CONSEQUENCES Should you fail to cure within 14 days: All claims, orders, and proceedings against me shall be considered void ab initio . All named agents will be held personally and commercially liable for trespass, coercion, harm, and misfeasance. The unrebutted facts herein will stand as a certificate of default and judgment by estoppel , enforceable in law. I reserve the right to finalise commercial liens against named individuals and to pursue private prosecution under common law. 8. OATH AND WITNESSING I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true, correct, and made in good faith. Signed and witnessed on 25th July 2025: by Jason : (Family Tyldesley), Hannah: (Family Lindsay), Jayne:(Family Mariarty) ANNEX A – REBUTTAL TO RELIANCE ON KOFA v OLDHAM [2024] EWHC 685 (ADMIN) Context Companies House prosecutors (particularly Pete Cowan) have repeatedly cited Kofa v Oldham [2024] EWHC 685 (Admin) as justification for proceeding with enforcement in the absence of my explicit consent. Rebuttal Material Difference of Subject Matter Kofa v Oldham concerned the administrative enforcement of council tax liability orders within a statutory framework that had been voluntarily entered into and accepted by the liable parties through their residence and participation in that framework. It did not address the fundamental question of whether jurisdiction can be lawfully established over a living man or woman absent explicit, informed contractual agreement . No Application to Companies House Claims The case does not address the Companies Act 2006 , nor the creation or enforcement of obligations against a living man acting outside of statutory joinder. It cannot be stretched to legitimise the imposition of obligations on me, a living man, in the absence of a proven, informed, and voluntary contract . Failure to Address Jurisdictional Challenge Reliance on Kofa is non‑responsive to my lawful notices. My position has consistently been: Statutory obligations cannot bind me or associated legal fictions without explicit informed consent . Any purported authority over me requires proof of contract (two wet signatures) and jurisdiction. Kofa provides no such proof . Judgment is Limited to Its Facts The High Court in Kofa did not create a universal rule that consent is unnecessary for all statutory enforcement. It confirmed only that, within its narrow context, statutory provisions applied to individuals already recognised within that administrative jurisdiction. It does not extinguish the requirement for lawful joinder when attempting to exercise authority over a non‑consenting living man. Estoppel Remains As no sworn rebuttal addressing my core points has been received, their continued reliance on Kofa constitutes a dismissal , not a rebuttal. This maintains the estoppel by conduct and silence already established in my notices. Conclusion Kofa v Oldham is irrelevant to the issues of lawful consent, joinder, and contractual obligation raised in my notices and this affidavit. It cannot establish jurisdiction over me, nor prove the lawfulness of Companies House’s actions. Previous Item Next Item

​This item is connected to a text field in your content manager. Double click the dataset icon to add your own content. I am a title 02 This item is connected to a text field in your content manager. Double click the dataset icon to add your own content. Previous Item Next Item This item is connected to a text field in your content manager. Double click the dataset icon to add your own content. Want to view and manage all your collections? Click the Data icon on the add panel to your left. In the Content Manager, you can update your items, add new fields, create dynamic pages and more. Your collection is already set up with fields and content. Add your own by editing each field, or import CSV files to your content manager. You can create fields for rich text, images, videos and more. Remember to click Sync, so visitors can see your collections on your live site. You can add as many collections as you need. Use input elements like custom forms and fields to collect info from your site visitors and store it in your content manager Collections. Make sure all your elements Connect to Data, and Preview your Live Site to check that everything is correctly binded.

Notices & Declarations Previous Item Next Item 29 September 2025 Devon Magistrates Court, Steve Hearse, Torridge Council, Devon & Cornwall Police Licensing Claim - Adjournment documents Response Collection ZJR-TDC-Licensing Claims 25.09.22 Alessandro Roveri Notice of New Date of Hearing .pdf Download PDF • 2.93MB 25.06.03 Alessandro Roveri Notice of new date of hearing (1) .pdf Download PDF • 3.12MB 25.06.03 Alessandro Roveri Notice of new date of hearing .pdf Download PDF • 3.05MB 25.04.09 Court Summons .pdf Download PDF • 143.73MB 25.08.26 Alessandro Roveri Notice of Date of New Hearing .pdf Download PDF • 3.06MB 25.06.20 Alessandro Roveri Notice of new date of hearing .pdf Download PDF • 2.85MB Previous Item Next Item

Notices & Declarations Previous Item Next Item 13 October 2025 Devon & Cornwall Police, Devon Magistrates Court, Torridge Council NOTICE OF DISHONOR, CLARIFICATION REQUEST, AND FUNDAMENTAL CHALLENGE Motion to Dismiss, Notice ZJR-TDC-Licensing Claims With Prejudice. Notice to principal is notice to agent, notice to agent is notice to principal. From: Jason : family Tyldesley — a living man Zen Jungle Retreat, Wooda Lakes, Pancrasweek, Holsworthy, Devon. EX22 7JN To: The Justices' Clerk, Barnstaple Magistrates' Court, North Walk, Barnstaple, Devon EX31 1DU The Crown Court (Clerk), Southernhay Gardens, Exeter, Devon EX1 1UH Chief Executive & Head of Legal, Torridge District Council, Riverbank House, Bideford, Devon EX39 2QG Chief Constable, Devon & Cornwall Police, Police Headquarters, Middlemoor, Exeter, Devon, EX2 7HQ Your Reference/ Case Nos: 502500030055 (Personal : JASON BRIAN TYLDESLEY) & 502500030128 (company: Zen Jungle Retreat Limited) Date: 13th October 2025 Re: Follow-up to Notice of Procedural Trespass dated 29th September 2025; Dishonor; Clarification of Case Status; Challenge to Foundational Authority 1. NOTICE OF DISHONOR On 29th September 2025, a comprehensive Notice of Procedural Trespass and Criminal Wrongdoing, together with supporting Affidavit of Truth, was served upon all four parties listed above via Special Delivery. That Notice: Challenged jurisdiction, consent, and joinder Identified fatal defects in both the personal and company cases Demanded proof of lawful authority to proceed Required written response within 14 days Detailed crimes committed by State agents (trespass, false imprisonment, interference) Gave Notice of Intended Prosecution Fourteen (14) days have now elapsed. No response has been received from any party. Effect of Silence By the maxims of law: Silence is acquiescence He who does not deny, admits An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth The facts, claims, and challenges set out in the Notice of 29th September 2025 therefore stand unrebutted on the record and are now established as truth. Specifically, the following remain uncontested and are therefore accepted: No lawful defendant exists in either case No joinder or contract has been proven or produced The personal case was void ab initio The company case cannot attach to a living being without proven joinder Trespass to land, trespass to person, and false imprisonment were committed by State agents All presumptions of personhood, jurisdiction, and consent are null and void This constitutes dishonor. 2. URGENT CLARIFICATION REQUIRED The hearing date of 17th October 2025 is now four days away . Despite the events of 18-19th September 2025, critical information has not been provided: A. Status of the Personal Case (502500030055) Last adjournment notice dated 3rd June stated adjournment to 20th June, none since. It stated that “the case may proceed in your absence”, no threat of arrest. Was this case formally withdrawn, abandoned, or consolidated? If this was the case used to create the 19th September hearing, why no notices? If it remains active, where is the adjournment notice (with time) for 17th October? On what legal basis does a personal case exist for a company licensing matter? B. Bail Status At the hearing of 19th September, the Magistrate purported to place "me" on unconditional bail Adjournment & Bail were both discussed in my absence. No written notice of bail or adjournment has been received since. What was the basis for arrest, and the basis for bail? - No hearing was scheduled or missed. To whom does bail attach—the living man or a purported "defendant"? Without notice, how can compliance or breach be determined? C. Company Case Adjournment (502500030128) An adjournment notice was received for the company case to 17th October 2025 It requests "attendance of a director or company secretary" Both are statutory legal persons (offices), not living beings Without proven joinder, no living being can be compelled to appear in such a role D. Procedural Confusion The chronology demonstrates systematic irregularity: Personal case: no adjournment beyond June, yet arrest in September Hearing of 19th September: personal case adjourned to 17th October (stated verbally, absent me) Adjournment notice dated 22nd September: only the company case listed for 17th October 2pm. No reference to bail, personal case, or the living man. This creates intolerable uncertainty and suggests the personal case is being used as a device for coercion while being quietly abandoned in favor of the company case. Clarification Demanded Within 48 hours of receipt of this Notice, provide in writing: Confirmation of the status of case 502500030055 (personal case): active, withdrawn, consolidated, or abandoned? If active, provide the lawful basis for a personal case in a company licensing matter Written confirmation of bail status, conditions, and to whom bail attaches Confirmation of which case(s) will be heard on 17th October 2025, with scheduled time(s). Proof of joinder or contract showing authority to compel a living being to represent a statutory person. Failure to clarify constitutes further dishonor and evidence of bad faith. 3. POSITION REGARDING 17TH OCTOBER 2025 Given the silence, confusion, and unresolved jurisdictional challenges, I state the following for the record: A. No Lawful Defendant Exists As set out in the unrebutted Notice of 29th September: The personal case has no statutory foundation (licensing attaches to companies, not living beings) The company case cannot proceed without proven joinder to a living representative I am Jason : family Tyldesley, a living man—not a "person" (legal or natural) within the meaning of statute I have never consented to represent any statutory person No contract of joinder has been produced Therefore: there is no defendant capable of answering either case. B. Special Appearance Under Duress (If Applicable) If I attend on 17th October, it will be: Under duress and protest only For the sole purpose of challenging jurisdiction Not to submit to the court's claimed authority Not as a "defendant," "person," or representative of any statutory entity I do not recognize the court's jurisdiction over a living man absent proof of consent, joinder, or lawful authority. Any attendance is conditional and does not constitute: Acceptance of personhood Submission to jurisdiction Consent to be treated as a defendant Waiver of any rights or standing This shall be stated clearly on the record if I appear. C. If I Do Not Attend Non-attendance would not constitute: Failure to appear (as no lawful defendant exists) Contempt (as no jurisdiction has been proven) Admission of any claim Rather, it would reflect: The absence of a proven defendant The system's failure to rebut foundational challenges The lack of lawful authority to compel attendance Any further warrant or conviction in absence would constitute: Continuation of false imprisonment Proceeding without jurisdiction Evidence that the system relies on force, not authority 4. THE FUNDAMENTAL CHALLENGE This matter has now moved beyond procedural irregularities. It concerns the foundational legitimacy of the system's claimed authority. The Core Question Does the statutory system have lawful authority over a living being who has not consented, or does it proceed by presumption, conditioning, and force? This is not "pseudolaw." It is a challenge to the jurisdictional basis of the system itself. The System's Response Options The system has three options: Option 1: Prove Authority Produce evidence of joinder, contract, or consent Demonstrate how statute lawfully binds a living being who has explicitly refused personhood Rebut the challenges with sworn testimony and evidence Option 2: Admit the Presumption Acknowledge that the system operates on presumption of consent Admit that no explicit contract exists Concede that jurisdiction rests on assumption, not proof Option 3: Proceed by Force Ignore the jurisdictional challenge Label it "pseudolaw" without rebuttal Enforce through arrest, detention, and penalty Rely on might, not right Fourteen Days of Silence Suggests Option 3 The failure to respond is telling. It suggests: The system cannot rebut the challenge The system will not admit the presumption The system will proceed with force regardless But force is not authority. It is evidence of the absence of authority. The Label of "Pseudolaw" The term "pseudolaw" is used to dismiss challenges without engaging with them. It is a form of conditioning—a reflexive response that protects the system from examination. But the challenge remains: Statute is a human-created system. This is not disputed. Living beings exist prior to and independent of statute. This is not disputed. Statute binds what it creates: persons (legal and natural). This is confirmed by statute itself. Living beings are not persons unless they consent. This follows logically and philosophically. Calling this "pseudolaw" does not rebut it. It merely avoids the question. The Question for the Record I ask the Court, the Council, and the Police directly: Do you claim authority over a living man on the basis of: Proven consent and contract? (If so, produce it.) Presumption? (If so, admit it.) Force? (If so, acknowledge that authority rests on coercion, not legitimacy.) Silence or evasion confirms Option 3: the system proceeds by force, conditioning, and presumption—not by lawful authority. 5. CRIMES REMAIN UNREBUTTED The Notice of 29th September detailed crimes committed by State agents: Trespass to land (10th June 2025) Trespass to person (18th September 2025) False imprisonment (29 hours detention) Misrepresentation and interference (19th September hearing) These remain unrebutted. No response, no denial, no justification has been provided. By silence, these crimes are admitted. Agents remain personally liable. The Notice of Intended Prosecution stands. 6. DOCUMENTARY CHAIN This Notice forms part of the continuing documentary record, which includes: Notice of Procedural Trespass and Affidavit of Truth (29th September 2025) ✓ This Follow-Up Notice (13th October 2025) ✓ Jurisdictional Challenge (21st April 2025) ✓ Estoppel after Jurisdictional Challenge (11th June 2025) ✓ Multiple conditional acceptances and notices (May–September 2025) ✓ Defective warrant, arrest records, and court transcripts ✓ All documents are preserved and published at: https://www.zenjungle.org/sovereign-community/notices-and-declarations-list This ensures transparency, prevents spoliation, and creates an accessible record for all interested parties. 7. SUMMARY 14 days have passed with no response: dishonor is confirmed Critical information remains withheld: bad faith is evident No lawful defendant exists: both cases fail The fundamental challenge remains unanswered: authority is unproven Crimes by State agents remain unrebutted: liability stands 17th October is four days away: clarification is urgent Required Within 48 Hours: Status of personal case 502500030055 Bail confirmation and conditions Which case(s) proceed on 17th October Proof of joinder or lawful authority Response to the foundational jurisdictional challenge If No Response: Further dishonor is established The system's reliance on force over authority is confirmed Any action taken on 17th October proceeds without jurisdiction All consequences flow to the agents acting without lawful authority 8. CLOSING STATEMENT Authority is either legitimate or it is imposed by force and deception. Fourteen days of silence speaks volumes. The living man stands outside the statutory boundary, unconsented, unjoindered, and unbound. Prove otherwise, or admit you cannot. All rights reserved. None waived. Signed: _____________________________Jason : family Tyldesley, a living man Date: 13th October 2025 Service: This Notice is being served via: Special Delivery (tracked) to all four parties Publication at https://www.zenjungle.org/sovereign-community/notices-and-declarations-list Proof of service will be retained. Previous Item Next Item

Notices & Declarations Previous Item Next Item 31 July 2025 Public Notice, Torridge Council, Companies House Trespass Notice Notice NOTICE OF TRESPASS & PERSONAL LIABILITY This land is private property under the lawful possession of a private trust , held exclusively for the benefit of living men and women. We stand under Natural Law and Common Law . Statutory legislation does not apply within this domain. No statutory implied right of access exists and all such rights are expressly revoked. Entry Conditions & Denial of Access Entry is by private invitation only . Police, bailiffs, warrant officers, enforcement agents, statutory officers, or any other representatives acting under statutory codes are expressly denied access. No statutory orders, warrants, notices, or penalties are valid or recognised on this land. Lawful Warrant Requirement No warrant, order, or enforcement action shall be recognised unless it: Originates under Common Law jurisdiction ; Bears the wet-ink signature and seal of a living judge ; and Is accompanied by full proof of claim , establishing lawful authority, standing, and jurisdiction. Any party attempting to enter under statutory warrant or administrative order will be deemed to be acting unlawfully and in personal capacity . Trespass & Liability Unlawful entry constitutes trespass and incurs personal liability in private capacity. Refusal to leave when asked will be billed at: £1,000 for the first refusal £5,000 for the second refusal £10,000 for the third refusal Aggravated trespass incurs a minimum liability of £250,000 . Previous Item Next Item

Notices & Declarations Previous Item Next Item 20 June 2025 Torridge Council, Steve Hearse Conditional Acceptance and Rebuttal Notice, Conditional Acceptance JT-Council Tax, Account 411116152 WITHOUT PREJUDICE NOTICE OF REBUTTAL, CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE, AND LAWFUL NON-ATTENDANCE RE: CASE NOs. 294249 & 294458 – Council Tax Summonses Dated 16 and 17 June 2025 Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal, and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent From: Jason: (Family Tyldesley) A living man under common law jurisdiction Wooda Lakes, Pancrasweek, Holsworthy, Devon EX22 7JN To: Steve Hearse , Chief Executive (Principal), Torridge District Council, Riverbank House, Bideford, Devon EX39 2QG & The Clerk , North & East Devon Magistrates Court, Civic Centre, Barnstaple, Devon EX31 1DX Date: 20th June 2025 SUMMARY OF POSITION This is a lawful notice of rebuttal, conditional acceptance , and formal notice of non-attendance to the summonses referenced above, issued in clear breach of lawful notice and without demonstrated proof of authority, jurisdiction, obligation, or lawful agency. You have failed to respond to the “System Removal Notice” served on 4 March 2025 (signed copy enclosed) , which revoked all consent and demanded lawful proof of claim. Your continued presumption constitutes knowing trespass, harassment, and misrepresentation. KEY DECLARATIONS I am a living man , not a corporate fiction, legal person, or subject of statutory governance. I am neither a resident, citizen, agent, employee, nor officer of any political corporation or statutory body. I am not contractually bound to any administrative scheme or regulation unless: Full disclosure was provided; A valid, mutually agreed contract was formed; Two wet-ink signatures exist as evidence of explicit, voluntary consent. I do not consent to represent the legal fiction “JASON TYLDESLEY” , nor do I act as its agent, surety, or trustee. No evidence has been presented proving that: Lawful jurisdiction exists over me as a living man; A verifiable obligation exists under common law; I have lawfully and knowingly surrendered inalienable rights. ON STATUTORY PRESUMPTION VS. LAWFUL AUTHORITY Statutory systems operate by consent and under presumption . They are administrative mechanisms of governance, not instruments of law. Without lawful contract or explicit, informed consent , all claims remain presumptive and non-binding. Administration becomes criminal when: Consent is explicitly denied yet ignored; Presumptions are enforced as obligations; No accountability is provided for those enforcing unverified claims. This is no longer administration —it is unlawful governance by deception and coercion. Any officer or employee acting upon such false claims incurs personal liability. NOTICE OF TRESPASS AND PERSONAL LIABILITY Effective immediately, any further: Summons, demand, or enforcement; Use of my private address for unsolicited statutory claims; Reliance upon presumed agency, citizenship, or residency… … constitutes trespass , fraud , and criminal misrepresentation , with full personal liability falling on the claimant. You are reminded: No immunity exists for ultra vires acts —an agency cannot shield individuals from accountability for unlawful acts done in its name. A trespass fee of £1,000 per instance will now apply, along with full lawful claims for damages. NOTICE OF LAWFUL NON-ATTENDANCE As there has been: No verified proof of lawful jurisdiction; No contract, no consent, no joinder; No named individual accepting liability; And continued attempts at forced joinder despite notice… …I will not attend your administrative summons. Attendance would imply consent to your unlawful presumption. This notice stands as formal rebuttal of jurisdiction , denial of all claims , and refusal of contract . You are now on notice. FORMAL NOTICE TO THE CLERK AND MAGISTRATES COURT Let it be known for the avoidance of doubt: I do not recognise the authority of the Magistrates’ Court in this matter unless lawful jurisdiction is first proven. The Magistrates’ Court is an administrative forum , acting under presumption of consent and authority. Now that jurisdiction has been lawfully challenged, this court must: Prove jurisdiction with verifiable evidence; Dismiss the claim in absence thereof; or Refer the matter to a court capable of hearing a jurisdictional challenge, such as the High Court. If this administrative forum proceeds without resolving the jurisdictional challenge , it acts ultra vires , without lawful standing, and any resulting orders or penalties are null and void ab initio . LAWFUL DEMANDS You are now required to: Immediately withdraw all summonses and claims . Provide proof of lawful authority, contract, and jurisdiction . Acknowledge personal liability by identifying the human being(s) making these claims. Chief Executive Steve Hearse , as the named principal and recipient of prior notice, is now personally liable for all further trespass, damages, and misrepresentations. All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit I do not consent. I do not accept your offer to contract. I waive the benefits. Yours faithfully, Signed and dated 20th June 2025 Jason: (Family Tyldesley) Living man, under common law (All inalienable rights reserved) Prior Communications - All signed as dated WITHOUT PREJUDICE NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL; NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT Jason : (Family Tyldesley)Wooda Lakes, PancrasweekHolsworthy, DevonEX22 7JN To: Steve Hearse (Chief Executive)Torridge District Council, Riverbank House Bideford DevonEX39 2QG Date: 4th March 2025 Subject: Final Notice – Revocation of Assumed Consent, Demand for Removal from Mailing Lists, and Immediate Cessation of All Statutory Claims, Licensing, Enforcement, and Regulatory Demands Against All Associated Legal Entities 1. Declaration of Living Status, Revocation of Assumed or Presumed Consent, and Legal Entities Covered I, Jason : of the family Tyldesley, am a living, breathing man under common law jurisdiction and not a legal fiction, corporate entity, or statutory person. This notice applies to all legal entities associated with me as a living being , including: The legal person : “JASON TYLDESLEY” (a statutory creation presumed without full disclosure or explicit agreement). All associated companies : Zen Jungle Limited (Company No. 12553647) Zen Jungle Retreat Limited (Company No. 12763398) Zen Jungle Estates Limited (Company No. 12758334) Revocation of Assumed Consent & Prohibition of Unlawful Claims of Any Kind I have never consented to representation by a legal fiction and therefore hold no obligation to any contracts, liabilities, or statutory claims presumed under that fiction. I hereby revoke any and all assumed or presumed consent to any statutory obligation, past, present, or future, related to any of the above entities. No claim of any kind that relies on the assumption of statutory authority is lawful unless full, verifiable proof is provided that such claims lawfully apply to a living being. This includes, but is not limited to: Council tax demands and property-related claims. Business rates, licensing requirements, and statutory registrations. Fines, penalties, or enforcement actions under statutory regulations. Any statutory obligation claimed against myself or any associated company. I declare that any claim reliant on assumption or presumption of consent to statute is unlawful following this revocation , as consent cannot lawfully be presumed once explicitly denied. If Torridge District Council believes it has lawful authority over me or any of the above-listed entities, it must now provide strict proof of claim (see Section 4). 2. Formal Demand for Immediate Removal from Torridge District Council Systems I do not consent to any continued use of my name, legal person, associated companies, or property address in any mailing lists, automated systems, or databases used to generate statutory claims, licensing demands, enforcement actions, or unsolicited correspondence . Under common law rights to privacy, property, and non-interference , I now require: Immediate and permanent removal of Jason : (Family Tyldesley), JASON TYLDESLEY, and all associated companies from all Torridge District Council databases and automated processing systems. A complete and permanent cessation of all statutory demands, penalty notices, enforcement actions, and further correspondence. Written confirmation within 14 days that all records have been updated and no further automated claims will be generated. Failure to comply will constitute unlawful interference, harassment, and trespass upon my property. 3. Explicit Non-Consent to Statutory Data Processing (GDPR Referenced with Non-Jurisdiction Clause) While this demand is made under common law , I also make the following explicit non-consent declaration under your own statutory data processing rules : I do not recognize GDPR as overriding my inalienable rights under common law. However, since Torridge District Council operates within statutory frameworks, it must adhere to its own rules. Under Article 17 (Right to Erasure) and Article 21 (Right to Object) of the UK GDPR , I now explicitly object to any further processing of my personal data for unsolicited statutory claims. Failure to comply confirms that Torridge District Council is acting unlawfully under both common law and its own statutory requirements. 4. Strict Proof of Claim – Final Opportunity to Prove Lawful Authority If Torridge District Council believes it has lawful authority over me, I require: Proof of jurisdiction – Evidence that the Council has lawful (not assumed) authority over me as a living being , not just my legal fiction or associated companies. Proof of lawful claim – Full evidence that any statutory claims, licensing requirements, or enforcement actions are valid, binding, and lawfully applicable beyond mere statutory assumption. Proof that my inalienable rights were knowingly waived – A wet-ink, mutually signed contract showing my fully informed, explicit, and voluntary consent to be bound by statutory obligations. Failure to provide all of the above will confirm that no lawful claim exists and that all prior demands were issued fraudulently, without due process, and under false presumption of authority. 5. Notice of Trespass – Unlawful Use of Private Property for Fraudulent Claims Effective immediately , I serve formal notice that any further: Statutory demands, licensing requirements, enforcement notices, fines, or penalties sent to my private address , or Attempts to enforce obligations upon me without lawful proof of claim … will constitute trespass, harassment, and fraudulent misrepresentation. Consequences of Further Trespass A fee of £1,000 per unsolicited statutory demand, penalty notice, or unlawful claim sent to my address. Formal legal action for harassment, misrepresentation, and interference if further correspondence is received. A claim for damages against Torridge District Council and any individuals responsible for non-compliance. 6. Royal Mail Notification – Return to Sender for Unlawful Correspondence In addition to this notice, I will be formally notifying Royal Mail that all correspondence from Torridge District Council is to be returned to sender . Any mail from Torridge District Council attempting to reach my property will be deemed an unwanted statutory claim , for which Torridge District Council will remain fully liable. Any claims that I “did not respond” after this notice will be fraudulent, as Torridge District Council will have knowingly ignored my lawful demand for non-interference. 7. Final Warning and Consequences of Non-Compliance This is your final opportunity to lawfully resolve this matter. I now require: Written confirmation within 14 days that my legal person and all associated companies have been removed from all Torridge District Council systems. A formal statement confirming that no further statutory claims will be generated, sent, or enforced against me. Strict proof of claim if you believe you have lawful authority to override this notice. Failure to comply within 14 days will result in: A formal complaint filed with the ICO against Torridge District Council for unlawful data processing. A lawful claim for damages for trespass, misrepresentation, and harassment. Further lawful notices of liability against any individuals responsible. This is not a request —this is a lawful demand based on inalienable rights, natural justice, and fundamental privacy principles. I expect full and immediate compliance. Yours sincerely, Jason : (Family Tyldesley) Living Being under Common Law Jurisdiction(All Inalienable Rights Explicitly Claimed and Reserved, Without Prejudice) DECLARATION OF NON-CONSENT AND LIVING AWARENESS Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent. Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal. I, the living man/woman known as Jason: (Family Tydelsey) , standing in my natural capacity under natural and common law, do hereby give notice as follows: ✦ 1. Living Being I am a living, conscious being of flesh, blood, and breath. I am not a legal fiction, corporate entity, trust, title, estate, or any registered instrument. I do not consent to the presumption of such identity, nor to being treated as subject to commercial or administrative codes. ✦ 2. Inalienable Rights My rights are inborn, inviolable, and inalienable. These include, but are not limited to: the right to life, freedom, privacy, freedom of movement, self-determination, freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, conscience, bodily autonomy, security of property, trade, barter, and the right to contract—or not to contract—freely. These rights are not subject to grant, regulation, removal, or surrender. Any act or claim that attempts to override, restrict, or administratively bind these rights without lawful contract is void, unlawful, and without effect . ✦ 3. No Joinder or Assumed Agency I do not consent to any joinder with a legal person, trust, estate, or registered name created or maintained without my explicit knowledge and agreement. No other being, organisation, or institution may lawfully act as agent, trustee, surety, or executor on my behalf without a valid, lawful contract between living beings, executed with full disclosure, mutual agreement, and two wet ink signatures. No act of registration, including at birth or thereafter, creates lawful agency or obligation upon me. ✦ 4. No Contract, No Obligation I stand under natural and common law only, and am bound by no external authority, jurisdiction, or obligation unless founded upon a valid contract made knowingly, voluntarily, with full disclosure, explicit consent, and two wet ink signatures. Where no such contract exists, no obligation is lawfully owed. ✦ 5. Inferior Jurisdictions Require Consent Jurisdictions such as statute, equity, maritime or admiralty are consensual constructs. I do not consent to their application to me without lawful contract and proven joinder. No claim of jurisdiction may arise from registration, presumption, silence, or assumed benefit. ✦ 6. Revocation of Implied Consent I revoke all presumed, inherited, or implied consents—whether arising from silence, registration, or non-rebuttal. Consent must be expressed and informed; presumption is not proof. ✦ 7. No Obligation to Respond or Perform Receipt of communication is not evidence of agreement. No duty exists to respond, appear, or perform in the absence of lawful contract. Silence is not acquiescence. ✦ 8. Living Awareness Sovereignty is not granted; it is the nature of being. I stand as source-aware and self-originating, and do not submit to any construct, claim, or jurisdiction lacking moral or lawful basis. ✴️ Lawful and Enduring Principles This notice stands upon enduring lawful and moral principles, including: Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescit – That which is void from the beginning cannot become valid by the passage of time. Consensus facit legem – Consent makes the law. Inalienable rights cannot be transferred or removed. He who asserts must prove. The burden of proof lies upon the claimant. All rights reserved. No rights waived.Given for the record and in honour. Autograph of the Living Being: ________________________ Date: ________________________ UNIVERSAL STANDING DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGN STATUS AND REBUTTAL OF PRESUMED JURISDICTION Private and Without Prejudice Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent; Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal Special Delivery – For the Private Record I. LAWFUL STANDING DECLARATION I, a living man known as Jason:(Family Tyldesley) , born of nature and not a legal fiction, hereby affirm and declare my sovereign status. I am not subject to the authority of any man-made entity, corporation, Crown, or government unless by voluntary , informed , and explicit consent established via lawful joinder. No such consent has ever been knowingly or lawfully given. I am not the legal fiction, corporate entity, trust, or estate created or referenced by the registration of birth or issuance of any state-generated certificate or identity document. “That which is created is subject to its creator. I was not created by the state, and therefore I am not subject to it.” II. REBUTTAL OF PRESUMPTIONS, TRUSTS, JOINDER & AGENCY I rebut: Any presumption of statutory or equitable jurisdiction; Any constructive, resulting, or implied trust allegedly created in my name; Any presumption that I am the beneficiary , trustee , executor , employee , or agent of any such trust or entity without my express and lawful agreement; Any assumption of legal representation or agency on behalf of the legal fiction or Crown; Any attempt to substitute statutory obligations for lawful duty . I do not act, nor have I ever knowingly and voluntarily acted, as an agent , employee , servant , or representative of the Crown, the United Kingdom Government, or any corporate or governmental entity deriving authority from the Crown. There exists no contract or agreement: Bearing two wet ink signatures, Formed with full disclosure and lawful meeting of minds, Wherein I knowingly accepted a role of agency, representation, or employment. Any such presumption of service, employment, fiduciary role, or Crown agency is hereby lawfully rebutted in full . Nemo potest praesumitur alienam personam agere – No one is presumed to act as another’s agent without proof. All legal, commercial, or administrative constructs that rely upon: Assumed consent, Silence as agreement, Birth registration as contract, Single signature adhesion agreements, are hereby lawfully and finally rebutted in full. A valid contract requires full disclosure, two wet ink signatures, and a lawful meeting of minds. Without all three, no contract exists in law. III. DENIAL OF REPRESENTATION OF LEGAL PERSON I do not now, nor have I ever, consented to represent or act as agent for the legal fiction or corporate entity identified in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS as JASON BRIAN TYLDESLEY , whether in part or in whole, in any legal, commercial, or statutory context. Any presumption of such representation, joinder, or agency is hereby lawfully rebutted in full . There exists no valid or enforceable contract: Formed by mutual agreement, Made with full disclosure, Entered into voluntarily, and Signed with two wet ink signatures, that binds Jason:(Family Tyldesley) , a living man, to the obligations, debts, duties, or liabilities of the legal person JASON BRIAN TYLDESLEY . He who denies must rebut; he who alleges must prove. If such a contract or instrument exists, I require its presentation in full, signed by both parties, or all presumption of representation is null and void. IV. CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE ON PROOF OF CLAIM Any man, woman, or entity making a claim, demand, or order against me, or seeking performance, payment, or compliance, must first provide: Verified Proof of Claim – A sworn, signed statement under full commercial and personal liability; Proof of Jurisdiction – Demonstrating lawful authority over the living man Jason:(Family Tyldesley), not the legal fiction; Evidence of Lawful Contract – A valid agreement, bearing my wet ink signature, formed with full disclosure and mutual consent, not presumed or unilaterally imposed; Statement of Cause – Lawful basis for any alleged debt, obligation, or duty; Identification of Claimant – Full legal and personal identity of the living man or woman making the claim, including their capacity and liability; Proof of Injury or Harm – Evidence of a verifiable injured party and measurable damage or loss caused by the living man Jason:(Family Tyldesley), with direct causation and standing to claim. Failure to provide these items within 14 days constitutes tacit agreement that no lawful authority or claim exists and that any further action will be deemed harassment, trespass, and unlawful coercion. V. REBUTTAL OF STATUTORY PRESUMPTION & COERCION I rebut and do not consent to: The presumption of guilt over innocence; The inversion of burden of proof ; The use of threats, penalties, or fear to induce compliance; The treatment of men and women as subjects of legislation without explicit and lawful agreement. Consent cannot be presumed or coerced. That which is not freely given is void. Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescit. VI. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS I expressly reserve all inalienable rights under: Natural Law Common Law The Laws of God (where applicable) The original jurisdiction of the living I waive no rights by silence, mistake, omission, nor through the actions of third parties. Any action taken against me absent verifiable lawful authority will be treated as trespass with full lawful recourse. VII. NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST You are hereby placed on notice to cease and desist all presumptive claims, enforcement attempts, or administrative correspondence unless and until you meet the conditions listed above. Continued assertion without lawful proof will be considered wilful trespass and may result in: Lawful claims of harassment, Private penalties under trespass, Personal commercial liability. VIII. STANDING DECLARATION This document constitutes my final, standing, and universal rebuttal . No further engagement will be made unless new lawful evidence is presented. Reference this notice in all future matters. DECLARANT Jason:(Family Tyldesley) a living man All rights reserved, none waived Without prejudice Signature: ___________________________ Date: ____________________________ Previous Item Next Item