Notices & Declarations

20 June 2025

Torridge Council, Steve Hearse

Conditional Acceptance and Rebuttal

Notice, Conditional Acceptance

JT-Council Tax, Account 411116152

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

NOTICE OF REBUTTAL, CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE, AND LAWFUL NON-ATTENDANCE

RE: CASE NOs. 294249 & 294458 – Council Tax Summonses Dated 16 and 17 June 2025

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal, and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

From: Jason: (Family Tyldesley) A living man under common law jurisdiction Wooda Lakes, Pancrasweek, Holsworthy, Devon EX22 7JN

To: Steve Hearse, Chief Executive (Principal), Torridge District Council, Riverbank House, Bideford, Devon EX39 2QG

& The Clerk, North & East Devon Magistrates Court, Civic Centre, Barnstaple, Devon EX31 1DX

Date: 20th June 2025

SUMMARY OF POSITION

This is a lawful notice of rebuttal, conditional acceptance, and formal notice of non-attendance to the summonses referenced above, issued in clear breach of lawful notice and without demonstrated proof of authority, jurisdiction, obligation, or lawful agency. You have failed to respond to the “System Removal Notice” served on 4 March 2025 (signed copy enclosed), which revoked all consent and demanded lawful proof of claim. Your continued presumption constitutes knowing trespass, harassment, and misrepresentation.

KEY DECLARATIONS

I am a living man, not a corporate fiction, legal person, or subject of statutory governance.
I am neither a resident, citizen, agent, employee, nor officer of any political corporation or statutory body. I am not contractually bound to any administrative scheme or regulation unless:
- Full disclosure was provided;
- A valid, mutually agreed contract was formed;
- Two wet-ink signatures exist as evidence of explicit, voluntary consent.
I do not consent to represent the legal fiction “JASON TYLDESLEY”, nor do I act as its agent, surety, or trustee.
No evidence has been presented proving that:
- Lawful jurisdiction exists over me as a living man;
- A verifiable obligation exists under common law;
- I have lawfully and knowingly surrendered inalienable rights.

ON STATUTORY PRESUMPTION VS. LAWFUL AUTHORITY

Statutory systems operate by consent and under presumption. They are administrative mechanisms of governance, not instruments of law. Without lawful contract or explicit, informed consent, all claims remain presumptive and non-binding.

Administration becomes criminal when:

Consent is explicitly denied yet ignored;
Presumptions are enforced as obligations;
No accountability is provided for those enforcing unverified claims.

This is no longer administration—it is unlawful governance by deception and coercion. Any officer or employee acting upon such false claims incurs personal liability.

NOTICE OF TRESPASS AND PERSONAL LIABILITY

Effective immediately, any further:

Summons, demand, or enforcement;
Use of my private address for unsolicited statutory claims;
Reliance upon presumed agency, citizenship, or residency…

… constitutes trespass, fraud, and criminal misrepresentation, with full personal liability falling on the claimant.

You are reminded:

No immunity exists for ultra vires acts—an agency cannot shield individuals from accountability for unlawful acts done in its name.

A trespass fee of £1,000 per instance will now apply, along with full lawful claims for damages.

NOTICE OF LAWFUL NON-ATTENDANCE

As there has been:

No verified proof of lawful jurisdiction;
No contract, no consent, no joinder;
No named individual accepting liability;
And continued attempts at forced joinder despite notice…

…I will not attend your administrative summons. Attendance would imply consent to your unlawful presumption.

This notice stands as formal rebuttal of jurisdiction, denial of all claims, and refusal of contract. You are now on notice.

FORMAL NOTICE TO THE CLERK AND MAGISTRATES COURT

Let it be known for the avoidance of doubt:

I do not recognise the authority of the Magistrates’ Court in this matter unless lawful jurisdiction is first proven.
The Magistrates’ Court is an administrative forum, acting under presumption of consent and authority.
Now that jurisdiction has been lawfully challenged, this court must:
- Prove jurisdiction with verifiable evidence;
- Dismiss the claim in absence thereof; or
- Refer the matter to a court capable of hearing a jurisdictional challenge, such as the High Court.

If this administrative forum proceeds without resolving the jurisdictional challenge, it acts ultra vires, without lawful standing, and any resulting orders or penalties are null and void ab initio.

LAWFUL DEMANDS

You are now required to:

Immediately withdraw all summonses and claims.
Provide proof of lawful authority, contract, and jurisdiction.
Acknowledge personal liability by identifying the human being(s) making these claims.

Chief Executive Steve Hearse, as the named principal and recipient of prior notice, is now personally liable for all further trespass, damages, and misrepresentations.

Yours faithfully,

Signed and dated 20th June 2025

Jason: (Family Tyldesley) Living man, under common law (All inalienable rights reserved)

Prior Communications - All signed as dated

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL; NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Jason : (Family Tyldesley)Wooda Lakes, PancrasweekHolsworthy, DevonEX22 7JN

To: Steve Hearse (Chief Executive)Torridge District Council,

Riverbank House

Bideford

DevonEX39 2QG

Date:4th March 2025

Subject: Final Notice – Revocation of Assumed Consent, Demand for Removal from Mailing Lists, and Immediate Cessation of All Statutory Claims, Licensing, Enforcement, and Regulatory Demands Against All Associated Legal Entities

1. Declaration of Living Status, Revocation of Assumed or Presumed Consent, and Legal Entities Covered

I, Jason : of the family Tyldesley, am a living, breathing man under common law jurisdiction and not a legal fiction, corporate entity, or statutory person.

This notice applies to all legal entities associated with me as a living being, including:

The legal person: “JASON TYLDESLEY” (a statutory creation presumed without full disclosure or explicit agreement).
All associated companies:
- Zen Jungle Limited (Company No. 12553647)
- Zen Jungle Retreat Limited (Company No. 12763398)
- Zen Jungle Estates Limited (Company No. 12758334)

Revocation of Assumed Consent & Prohibition of Unlawful Claims of Any Kind

I have never consented to representation by a legal fiction and therefore hold no obligation to any contracts, liabilities, or statutory claims presumed under that fiction.
I hereby revoke any and all assumed or presumed consent to any statutory obligation, past, present, or future, related to any of the above entities.
No claim of any kind that relies on the assumption of statutory authority is lawful unless full, verifiable proof is provided that such claims lawfully apply to a living being.
This includes, but is not limited to:
- Council tax demands and property-related claims.
- Business rates, licensing requirements, and statutory registrations.
- Fines, penalties, or enforcement actions under statutory regulations.
- Any statutory obligation claimed against myself or any associated company.
I declare that any claim reliant on assumption or presumption of consent to statute is unlawful following this revocation, as consent cannot lawfully be presumed once explicitly denied.

If Torridge District Council believes it has lawful authority over me or any of the above-listed entities, it must now provide strict proof of claim (see Section 4).

2. Formal Demand for Immediate Removal from Torridge District Council Systems

I do not consent to any continued use of my name, legal person, associated companies, or property address in any mailing lists, automated systems, or databases used to generate statutory claims, licensing demands, enforcement actions, or unsolicited correspondence.

Under common law rights to privacy, property, and non-interference, I now require:

Immediate and permanent removal of Jason : (Family Tyldesley), JASON TYLDESLEY, and all associated companies from all Torridge District Council databases and automated processing systems.
A complete and permanent cessation of all statutory demands, penalty notices, enforcement actions, and further correspondence.
Written confirmation within 14 days that all records have been updated and no further automated claims will be generated.

Failure to comply will constitute unlawful interference, harassment, and trespass upon my property.

3. Explicit Non-Consent to Statutory Data Processing (GDPR Referenced with Non-Jurisdiction Clause)

While this demand is made under common law, I also make the following explicit non-consent declaration under your own statutory data processing rules:

I do not recognize GDPR as overriding my inalienable rights under common law.
However, since Torridge District Council operates within statutory frameworks, it must adhere to its own rules.
Under Article 17 (Right to Erasure) and Article 21 (Right to Object) of the UK GDPR, I now explicitly object to any further processing of my personal data for unsolicited statutory claims.

Failure to comply confirms that Torridge District Council is acting unlawfully under both common law and its own statutory requirements.

4. Strict Proof of Claim – Final Opportunity to Prove Lawful Authority

If Torridge District Council believes it has lawful authority over me, I require:

Proof of jurisdiction – Evidence that the Council has lawful (not assumed) authority over me as a living being, not just my legal fiction or associated companies.
Proof of lawful claim – Full evidence that any statutory claims, licensing requirements, or enforcement actions are valid, binding, and lawfully applicable beyond mere statutory assumption.
Proof that my inalienable rights were knowingly waived – A wet-ink, mutually signed contract showing my fully informed, explicit, and voluntary consent to be bound by statutory obligations.

Failure to provide all of the above will confirm that no lawful claim exists and that all prior demands were issued fraudulently, without due process, and under false presumption of authority.

5. Notice of Trespass – Unlawful Use of Private Property for Fraudulent Claims

Effective immediately, I serve formal notice that any further:

Statutory demands, licensing requirements, enforcement notices, fines, or penalties sent to my private address, or
Attempts to enforce obligations upon me without lawful proof of claim

… will constitute trespass, harassment, and fraudulent misrepresentation.

Consequences of Further Trespass

A fee of £1,000 per unsolicited statutory demand, penalty notice, or unlawful claim sent to my address.
Formal legal action for harassment, misrepresentation, and interference if further correspondence is received.
A claim for damages against Torridge District Council and any individuals responsible for non-compliance.

6. Royal Mail Notification – Return to Sender for Unlawful Correspondence

In addition to this notice, I will be formally notifying Royal Mail that all correspondence from Torridge District Council is to be returned to sender.

Any mail from Torridge District Council attempting to reach my property will be deemed an unwanted statutory claim, for which Torridge District Council will remain fully liable.
Any claims that I “did not respond” after this notice will be fraudulent, as Torridge District Council will have knowingly ignored my lawful demand for non-interference.

7. Final Warning and Consequences of Non-Compliance

This is your final opportunity to lawfully resolve this matter. I now require:

Written confirmation within 14 days that my legal person and all associated companies have been removed from all Torridge District Council systems.
A formal statement confirming that no further statutory claims will be generated, sent, or enforced against me.
Strict proof of claim if you believe you have lawful authority to override this notice.

Failure to comply within 14 days will result in:

A formal complaint filed with the ICO against Torridge District Council for unlawful data processing.
A lawful claim for damages for trespass, misrepresentation, and harassment.
Further lawful notices of liability against any individuals responsible.

This is not a request—this is a lawful demand based on inalienable rights, natural justice, and fundamental privacy principles.

I expect full and immediate compliance.

Yours sincerely,

Jason : (Family Tyldesley)Living Being under Common Law Jurisdiction(All Inalienable Rights Explicitly Claimed and Reserved, Without Prejudice)

DECLARATION OF NON-CONSENT AND LIVING AWARENESS

Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent. Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal.

I, the living man/woman known as Jason: (Family Tydelsey), standing in my natural capacity under natural and common law, do hereby give notice as follows:

✦ 1. Living Being

I am a living, conscious being of flesh, blood, and breath. I am not a legal fiction, corporate entity, trust, title, estate, or any registered instrument. I do not consent to the presumption of such identity, nor to being treated as subject to commercial or administrative codes.

✦ 2. Inalienable Rights

My rights are inborn, inviolable, and inalienable. These include, but are not limited to: the right to life, freedom, privacy, freedom of movement, self-determination, freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, conscience, bodily autonomy, security of property, trade, barter, and the right to contract—or not to contract—freely. These rights are not subject to grant, regulation, removal, or surrender. Any act or claim that attempts to override, restrict, or administratively bind these rights without lawful contract is void, unlawful, and without effect.

✦ 3. No Joinder or Assumed Agency

I do not consent to any joinder with a legal person, trust, estate, or registered name created or maintained without my explicit knowledge and agreement. No other being, organisation, or institution may lawfully act as agent, trustee, surety, or executor on my behalf without a valid, lawful contract between living beings, executed with full disclosure, mutual agreement, and two wet ink signatures. No act of registration, including at birth or thereafter, creates lawful agency or obligation upon me.

✦ 4. No Contract, No Obligation

I stand under natural and common law only, and am bound by no external authority, jurisdiction, or obligation unless founded upon a valid contract made knowingly, voluntarily, with full disclosure, explicit consent, and two wet ink signatures. Where no such contract exists, no obligation is lawfully owed.

✦ 5. Inferior Jurisdictions Require Consent

Jurisdictions such as statute, equity, maritime or admiralty are consensual constructs. I do not consent to their application to me without lawful contract and proven joinder. No claim of jurisdiction may arise from registration, presumption, silence, or assumed benefit.

✦ 6. Revocation of Implied Consent

I revoke all presumed, inherited, or implied consents—whether arising from silence, registration, or non-rebuttal. Consent must be expressed and informed; presumption is not proof.

✦ 7. No Obligation to Respond or Perform

Receipt of communication is not evidence of agreement. No duty exists to respond, appear, or perform in the absence of lawful contract. Silence is not acquiescence.

✦ 8. Living Awareness

Sovereignty is not granted; it is the nature of being. I stand as source-aware and self-originating, and do not submit to any construct, claim, or jurisdiction lacking moral or lawful basis.

✴️ Lawful and Enduring Principles

This notice stands upon enduring lawful and moral principles, including:

Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescit – That which is void from the beginning cannot become valid by the passage of time.
Consensus facit legem – Consent makes the law.
Inalienable rights cannot be transferred or removed.
He who asserts must prove.
The burden of proof lies upon the claimant.

Autograph of the Living Being: ________________________

Date: ________________________

UNIVERSAL STANDING DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGN STATUS AND REBUTTAL OF PRESUMED JURISDICTION

Private and Without Prejudice Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent; Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal Special Delivery – For the Private Record

I. LAWFUL STANDING DECLARATION

I, a living man known as Jason:(Family Tyldesley), born of nature and not a legal fiction, hereby affirm and declare my sovereign status.

I am not subject to the authority of any man-made entity, corporation, Crown, or government unless by voluntary, informed, and explicit consent established via lawful joinder. No such consent has ever been knowingly or lawfully given.

I am not the legal fiction, corporate entity, trust, or estate created or referenced by the registration of birth or issuance of any state-generated certificate or identity document.

“That which is created is subject to its creator. I was not created by the state, and therefore I am not subject to it.”

II. REBUTTAL OF PRESUMPTIONS, TRUSTS, JOINDER & AGENCY

I rebut:

Any presumption of statutory or equitable jurisdiction;
Any constructive, resulting, or implied trust allegedly created in my name;
Any presumption that I am the beneficiary, trustee, executor, employee, or agent of any such trust or entity without my express and lawful agreement;
Any assumption of legal representation or agency on behalf of the legal fiction or Crown;
Any attempt to substitute statutory obligations for lawful duty.

I do not act, nor have I ever knowingly and voluntarily acted, as an agent, employee, servant, or representative of the Crown, the United Kingdom Government, or any corporate or governmental entity deriving authority from the Crown.

There exists no contract or agreement:

Bearing two wet ink signatures,
Formed with full disclosure and lawful meeting of minds,
Wherein I knowingly accepted a role of agency, representation, or employment.

Any such presumption of service, employment, fiduciary role, or Crown agency is hereby lawfully rebutted in full.

Nemo potest praesumitur alienam personam agere – No one is presumed to act as another’s agent without proof.

All legal, commercial, or administrative constructs that rely upon:

Assumed consent,
Silence as agreement,
Birth registration as contract,
Single signature adhesion agreements,

are hereby lawfully and finally rebutted in full.

A valid contract requires full disclosure, two wet ink signatures, and a lawful meeting of minds. Without all three, no contract exists in law.

III. DENIAL OF REPRESENTATION OF LEGAL PERSON

I do not now, nor have I ever, consented to represent or act as agent for the legal fiction or corporate entity identified in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS as JASON BRIAN TYLDESLEY, whether in part or in whole, in any legal, commercial, or statutory context.

Any presumption of such representation, joinder, or agency is hereby lawfully rebutted in full.

There exists no valid or enforceable contract:

Formed by mutual agreement,
Made with full disclosure,
Entered into voluntarily, and
Signed with two wet ink signatures,

that binds Jason:(Family Tyldesley), a living man, to the obligations, debts, duties, or liabilities of the legal person JASON BRIAN TYLDESLEY.

He who denies must rebut; he who alleges must prove. If such a contract or instrument exists, I require its presentation in full, signed by both parties, or all presumption of representation is null and void.

IV. CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE ON PROOF OF CLAIM

Any man, woman, or entity making a claim, demand, or order against me, or seeking performance, payment, or compliance, must first provide:

Verified Proof of Claim – A sworn, signed statement under full commercial and personal liability;
Proof of Jurisdiction – Demonstrating lawful authority over the living man Jason:(Family Tyldesley), not the legal fiction;
Evidence of Lawful Contract – A valid agreement, bearing my wet ink signature, formed with full disclosure and mutual consent, not presumed or unilaterally imposed;
Statement of Cause – Lawful basis for any alleged debt, obligation, or duty;
Identification of Claimant – Full legal and personal identity of the living man or woman making the claim, including their capacity and liability;
Proof of Injury or Harm – Evidence of a verifiable injured party and measurable damage or loss caused by the living man Jason:(Family Tyldesley), with direct causation and standing to claim.

Failure to provide these items within 14 days constitutes tacit agreement that no lawful authority or claim exists and that any further action will be deemed harassment, trespass, and unlawful coercion.

V. REBUTTAL OF STATUTORY PRESUMPTION & COERCION

I rebut and do not consent to:

The presumption of guilt over innocence;
The inversion of burden of proof;
The use of threats, penalties, or fear to induce compliance;
The treatment of men and women as subjects of legislation without explicit and lawful agreement.

Consent cannot be presumed or coerced. That which is not freely given is void. Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescit.

VI. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS

I expressly reserve all inalienable rights under:

Natural Law
Common Law
The Laws of God (where applicable)
The original jurisdiction of the living

I waive no rights by silence, mistake, omission, nor through the actions of third parties. Any action taken against me absent verifiable lawful authority will be treated as trespass with full lawful recourse.

VII. NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST

You are hereby placed on notice to cease and desist all presumptive claims, enforcement attempts, or administrative correspondence unless and until you meet the conditions listed above.

Continued assertion without lawful proof will be considered wilful trespass and may result in:

Lawful claims of harassment,
Private penalties under trespass,
Personal commercial liability.

VIII. STANDING DECLARATION

This document constitutes my final, standing, and universal rebuttal. No further engagement will be made unless new lawful evidence is presented. Reference this notice in all future matters.

DECLARANT

Signature: ___________________________

Date: ____________________________