FINAL NOTICE OF VOID INSTRUMENTS, COERCION, AND ENFORCEMENT

Date: 1st September 2025 

References:

• Jacobs Enforcement Ref: 91070771 (Notice dated 19th August 2025)

• Companies House Ref: CR71/00032/25 (including letter dated 20th August 2025)

• Court Ref: 2500056578

• Cowan Letter: 28th August 2025
  

To:

• Jacobs Enforcement Ltd, 6 Europa Boulevard, Birkenhead, Wirral, CH41 4PE

• Louise Smyth CBE, Chief Executive & Registrar, Companies House, Crown Way, Cardiff, CF14 3UZ

• Jamie Phillips, Compliance Team Leader, Companies House, Crown Way, Cardiff, CF14 3UZ

• Pete Cowan, Prosecuting Solicitor, Companies House, Crown Way, Cardiff, CF14 3UZ

• Lee Jenkins, Prosecuting Solicitor, Companies House, Crown Way, Cardiff, CF14 3UZ

• Huw Morgan, Legal Adviser to the Justices, Cardiff Magistrates’ Court, Fitzalan Place, Cardiff, CF24 0RZ

From:

Jason : (Family Tyldesley) Wooda Lakes Pancrasweek Holsworthy Devon EX22 7JN

1. Jacobs Notice of Enforcement (19th August 2025)

On 19th August 2025, Jacobs Enforcement Ltd issued a Notice of Enforcement citing a “Warrant of Control” dated 16th August 2025.

• No such warrant has been evidenced.

• Should it exist, it would remain a defective administrative instrument, lacking judicial signature, seal, or lawful authority.

• As such, it is a void instrument, incapable of enforcement.

On 25th July 2025, I issued a sworn Affidavit of Truth and Court of Record, duly served on all relevant officers of Companies House and Cardiff Magistrates’ Court, convening a lawful Court of Record and requiring rebuttal by sworn affidavit within fourteen (14) days.

On 22nd August 2025, I issued a Certificate of Default and Notice of Enforcement, confirming that no rebuttals had been received, that estoppel was complete, and that all liens and liabilities are now matured and enforceable.

Both the Affidavit of Truth and the Certificate of Default have also been published to the public record via my repository, in addition to their service, and remain unrebutted and binding.

Furthermore, your “Notice of Enforcement” makes reference to a purported “Warrant of Control” dated 16th August 2025. No such warrant has been evidenced. Should such a document exist, it would still be an unlawful administrative instrument, lacking the signature of a living judge, lacking seal, and issued without lawful authority. A warrant without proper judicial execution is void on its face and incapable of enforcement.

Trust Property Warning

The companies referenced are vested in a private irrevocable express trust, and this has been notified to Companies House. As such, any attempt by Jacobs Enforcement Ltd or its agents to interfere with company assets constitutes not only trespass and harassment, but also theft and unlawful conversion of trust property.

Liability and Lien

You are hereby placed on notice:

• Any further attempt to contact me in relation to this void instrument, or to interfere with my rights or property, will constitute personal and commercial trespass.

• Jacobs Enforcement Ltd, its directors, and its certificated agents are hereby placed on notice. Any further attempt to act upon the void instrument referenced above, or to interfere with my rights or trust property, will constitute personal and commercial trespass. At that point, Jacobs Enforcement Ltd and its officers will be added to the existing commercial lien of £1,250,000 per individual, as published on the public record.

• Each further act of trespass or harassment will incur additional penalties as per the Schedule of Trespass dated 8th July 2025.

  
  

2. Companies House Letter (20th August 2025)

On 20th August 2025, Companies House issued further correspondence threatening director disqualification for five years and suggesting that I may file a DS01 form to voluntarily strike the company from the register.

• This represents further coercion, trespass, and harassment, as it continues despite the unrebutted affidavit of truth and certificate of default.

• The letter falsely presumes that I am “acting as a director,” conflating the legal fiction with the living man.

• To suggest voluntary dissolution is improper: it is coercive pressure and would result in unlawful conversion of assets belonging to the living man.

Additional Clarification on Trust Status

For the avoidance of doubt, the companies referenced are vested in a private irrevocable express trust, and this has been notified to Companies House. Acknowledgement of this notification has been received, even though the PSC record has not been amended.

The threats of disqualification and DS01 therefore rest on a false presumption that I, the living man, am “acting as director.” This presumption is fraudulent and stands in direct contradiction to the record already established in my Affidavit of Truth of 25th July 2025, which affirmed my status as a living man not joined to any office or corporate fiction.

Accordingly, the letter of 20th August 2025 constitutes knowing misrepresentation, coercion, and harassment, and is recorded as further trespass.

3. Court of Record Affidavit & Certificate of Default

On 25th July 2025, I served a sworn Affidavit of Truth and Court of Record upon all relevant parties, convening a lawful Court of Record. This affidavit required rebuttal by sworn affidavit within fourteen (14) days.

On 22nd August 2025, I issued a Certificate of Default, confirming that no rebuttals were received and that estoppel is now complete.

Both documents have also been published for public record at: 👉https://www.zenjungle.org/sovereign-community/notices-and-declarations-list 

Use “ZJR-Companies House” as Reference to filter to this specific case. 

Together, these instruments stand as a final judicial determination, unrebutted and binding in law and commerce.

4. Pete Cowan Letter (28th August 2025)

On 28th August 2025, I received a letter signed by Pete Cowan, Prosecuting Solicitor, Companies House.

• In this letter he asserts that my notices have “no legal effect” and are “pseudo-legal.” This is a dismissal, not a rebuttal, and fails to address any point under oath. It constitutes further dishonour and estoppel.

• He instructs that I should issue “pre-action protocol correspondence” to him in relation to a “High Court claim.” This demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding.

To be clear:

• This matter is not a new claim.

• The Court of Record judgment already stands.

• The High Court action will be a Part 7 track for enforcement only, converting the judgment into an enforceable debt. No “pre-action protocol” is required.
  

5. Notice of Enforcement Action

By this notice, I declare:

• A Part 7 enforcement action in the High Court of Justice will be initiated on or before 5th September 2025, to convert the Court of Record judgment into an enforceable High Court judgment debt.

• Formal liability notifications will be issued to all indemnity insurers of the named parties by the same date.

• No further debate or correspondence is required. This is not open to “legal argument”: the affidavit and default stand as unrebutted law.

6. Law vs Legalism

The addressees are reminded:

• Law arises from voluntary agreement, contract, and proven jurisdiction. It is foundational, universal, and binding upon all.

• Legalism is the administrative application of statutes and regulations within a jurisdiction where consent has been granted. Statutory processes without jurisdiction or consent are void.

The repeated assertion that these notices, affidavits, and liens are “pseudo-legal” is a dismissal, not a rebuttal. It reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of law itself:

• A statutory solicitor trained only in legislative enforcement may become myopic, assuming statute is law. This is incorrect. Statute may be lawful when consent is present, but it cannot bind without jurisdiction or contract.

• By calling matters of law “pseudo-legal,” one demonstrates confusion between the two domains. The term “pseudo-legal” itself has no meaning in law.

Further, Pete Cowan’s letter of 28th August 2025 shows this misunderstanding clearly. He instructs that “pre-action protocol” correspondence be sent to him, believing that a High Court action would represent a new claim. This is false. The Court of Record judgment already stands. The High Court role will be limited to enforcement only via the Part 7 track.

If other officers rely upon Pete Cowan’s advice or interpretation, they do so at their peril. Each of you is personally liable for the unrebutted notices you have received. Ignorance, reliance on another’s poor advice, or habitual deference to statutory conditioning will not absolve you.

You are urged to recognise that this matter is not “pseudo-legal.” It is lawful, binding, and enforceable. To dismiss it without proper rebuttal under oath is to deepen dishonour and extend personal liability.

7. Lien & Liability

Each named officer of Companies House and Cardiff Magistrates’ Court remains subject to a personal and commercial lien of £1,250,000, unrebutted and enforceable.

Jacobs Enforcement Ltd, its directors, and certificated agents are hereby placed on notice: should they proceed further in dishonour of this notice, they will be added to the lien schedule, and all accrued penalties will apply to them personally and corporately.

The Schedule of Trespass (8th July 2025) applies, with penalties for each act of trespass or harassment. Additional trespass penalties are now accrued for:

• Jacobs’ Notice of Enforcement (19th August 2025).

• Companies House letter (20th August 2025).

• Pete Cowan’s letter (28th August 2025).

These penalties are added to the liens and will be pursued in enforcement.

8. Enclosures & Appendices

For the avoidance of doubt, the following are enclosed and form part of this notice:

• Appendix A – Certificate of Default & Notice of Enforcement (22nd August 2025)

• Appendix B – Schedule of Trespass & Penalties (8th July 2025, updated as at 1st September 2025)

• Appendix C – Jacobs Enforcement Notice (19th August 2025)

• Appendix D – Companies House Letter (20th August 2025)

• Appendix E – Pete Cowan’s Letter (28th August 2025)

Note: The Affidavit of Truth & Court of Record (25th July 2025) has already been duly served and is published for public record at: 

👉https://www.zenjungle.org/sovereign-community/notices-and-declarations-list 

Use “ZJR-Companies House” as Reference to filter to this specific case. 

Final Declaration

Your “Notice of Enforcement,” further Companies House letters, and subsequent correspondence are null, void, and of no legal effect.

The lawful judgment already stands. Enforcement is in progress and will proceed without further notice.

Signed by my living hand and seal, this 1st day of September 2025.

Jason : (Family Tyldesley) Living Man under Common Law Court of Record Established

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

Appendix A – Notice of Default & Enforcement

Published at : https://www.zenjungle.org/notices-and-declarations/certificate-of-default---zjr---companies-house

Appendix B – Schedule of Trespass & Penalties

(Updated as at 1st September 2025)

Base Commercial Liens (already accrued)

• Louise Smyth CBE – £1,250,000

• Jamie Phillips – £1,250,000

• Pete Cowan – £1,250,000

• Lee Jenkins – £1,250,000

• Huw Morgan – £1,250,000

Subtotal (existing liens): £6,250,000

Trespass & Harassment Penalties

1. 8th July 2025 – Liability Notice & Lien (original schedule)

   • Penalties for continuing trespass and misrepresentation: £250,000 each

   • Already notified in prior schedule.

2. 19th August 2025 – Jacobs Enforcement Ltd, “Notice of Enforcement”

   • Attempted enforcement of void instrument.

   • Trespass/harassment penalty (conditional – crystallises if further pursued): £100,000 notice penalty

3. 20th August 2025 – Companies House disqualification/DS01 letter

   • Coercion, misrepresentation of status, harassment.

   • Additional penalty: £250,000 each officer

4. 28th August 2025 – Pete Cowan letter

   • Dismissal as “pseudo-legal,” misrepresentation, dishonour.

   • Additional penalty: £250,000 (Pete Cowan personally)

Updated Totals

• Base liens (5 officers): £6,250,000

• 8 July penalties (5 x £250k): £1,250,000

• Jacobs conditional penalty: £100,000

• 20 August penalties (4 officers × £250k – excluding Cowan who is penalised separately below): £1,000,000

• 28 August penalty (Cowan): £250,000

Grand Total: £8,850,000 (as at 1st September 2025, with Jacobs conditional penalty crystallising if further trespass occurs).

Notes

• All penalties are cumulative and form part of the commercial liens already published.

• Jacobs Enforcement Ltd and its officers are presently on notice only; penalties apply automatically if they act further in dishonour.

• This schedule will be updated continuously as new acts of trespass, harassment, or dishonour occur.

Appendix C – Jacob s Enforcement Notice

Appendix D – Companies House Letter ( 20th August 2025 )

Appendix E – Peter Cowan Letter(28th August 2025)